TITLE 19. EDUCATION

PART 1. TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD

CHAPTER 2. ACADEMIC AND WORKFORCE EDUCATION

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §2.6

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 2, Subchapter A, §2.6, concerning Administrative Completeness. Specifically, this amendment establishes clearer criteria that would warrant withdrawing and resubmitting an application for a new degree program based on changes made to the proposal after it is deemed administratively complete by the Coordinating Board.

Texas Education Code, §61.0512, requires the Coordinating Board to specify by rule the elements that constitute a completed application, make a determination of administrative completeness for each application, and review each application based on specific criteria including adequate financing.

Amendments to subsection (c) are designed to clarify for Board staff and institutions what type of information is required for an application to be administratively complete. Requests for additional program information may occur after a program is administratively complete and will not delay a request from being deemed administratively complete.

New subsection (e) specifies changes that significantly alter a proposed budget, intended labor market outcomes, academic focus, or other significant changes.

New subsection (f) requires that institutions obtain documentation of governing board approval of a revised degree program proposal submitted under subsection (e).

Elizabeth Mayer, Assistant Commissioner Academic and Health Affairs, has determined that for each of the first five years the sections are in effect there would be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

There is no impact on small businesses, micro businesses, and rural communities. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

Elizabeth Mayer, Assistant Commissioner Academic and Health Affairs, has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be clearer criteria that would warrant withdrawing and resubmitting an application for a new degree program.

Government Growth Impact Statement

(1) the rules will not create or eliminate a government program;

(2) implementation of the rules will not require the creation or elimination of employee positions;

(3) implementation of the rules will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency;

(4) the rules will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency;

(5) the rules will create a new rule;

(6) the rules will not limit an existing rule;

(7) the rules will not change the number of individuals subject to the rule; and

(8) the rules will not affect this state's economy.

Comments on the proposed rule or information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable data, research or analysis, may be submitted to Elizabeth Mayer, Assistant Commissioner Academic and Health Affairs, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711-2788, or via email at AHAComments@highered.texas.gov. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code, Section 61.0512, which requires the Coordinating Board to specify by rule the elements that constitute a completed application, make a determination of administrative completeness for each application, and review each application based on specific criteria including adequate financing.

The proposed amendment affects Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 2, Subchapter A.

§2.6. Administrative Completeness.

(a) An institution shall [must] submit a complete [fully completed] application for each proposed program for which approval is required that includes:

(1) each element or item of information required by this subchapter;

(2) each element or item of information required by the subchapter in this chapter governing the type of program approval required;

(3) the required Board form for the type of program approval required; and

(4) fully executed certifications.

(b) Board Staff shall determine whether an application is administratively complete and notify the institution not later than the fifth business day after receipt.

(1) If Board Staff determines an application is administratively complete, the institution shall be notified on that date and the one-year timeline for approval required by Texas Education Code 61.0512(a) shall begin.

(2) If Board staff determines an application is administratively incomplete, the application will be rejected, and the institution will be notified of the missing application elements.

(3) An institution may resubmit an application that was rejected as incomplete at any time. The resubmission will be considered a new application.

(c) Significant revisions related to the General Criteria for Program Approval, as defined in §2.5 of this subchapter (relating to General Criteria for Program Approval), made to a new degree program proposal after Board Staff determines an application to be administratively complete shall render the application to be incomplete and require resubmission of a new application. Significant revisions, as determined by the Assistant Commissioner, include:

(1) Revisions that result in significant alterations of the original proposed budget including, but not limited to:

(A) New costs or funding streams;

(B) Changes to enrollment projections;

(C) Changes to student funding, tuition, or fees;

(D) Changes to the faculty or staff hiring schedule; or

(E) Addition of, or changes to, resources or facilities required to administer the degree program.

(2) Revisions to the curriculum that significantly alter the academic focus or intended labor market outcomes for students enrolled in the degree program; or

(3) Other significant changes that result in the proposed program no longer meeting the criteria defined in §2.5(a)(5) of this subchapter.

(d) A resubmitted application submitted under the requirements of subsection (c) of this section shall require documentation of approval of the revisions from the institution's governing board.

[(c) If Board Staff determines that the application is incomplete or additional information or documentation is needed, the institution must respond with all of the requested information or documentation within ten business days or the request will be deemed incomplete and returned to the institution.]

[(d) An institution may resubmit an application that was returned as incomplete as soon as it has obtained the requested information or documentation. This submission will be considered a new application.]

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600064

Douglas Brock

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6182


CHAPTER 4. RULES APPLYING TO ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §4.10

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter A, §4.10, concerning Common Admission Application Forms. Specifically, this amendment will add the definition for private or independent institution of higher education and align language with legislative requirements related to Free College Application Week.

Texas Education Code, §51.762, provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules for the Common Admission Application Forms, and §61.0731, provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to establish rules to implement Free College Application Week.

Rule 4.10, Common Admission Application Forms, is amended to add the definition for private or independent institution of higher education and align language with legislative requirements related to Free College Application Week.

Dr. Brandon Griggs, Assistant Commissioner for College and Career Advising, has determined that for each of the first five years the sections are in effect there would be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

There is no impact on small businesses, micro businesses, and rural communities. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

Dr. Brandon Griggs, Assistant Commissioner for College and Career Advising, has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be the addition of a definition for private or independent institutions of higher education and alignment of language with legislative requirements related to Free College Application Week. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Government Growth Impact Statement

(1) the rules will not create or eliminate a government program;

(2) implementation of the rules will not require the creation or elimination of employee positions;

(3) implementation of the rules will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency;

(4) the rules will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency;

(5) the rules will not create a new rule;

(6) the rules will not limit an existing rule;

(7) the rules will not change the number of individuals subject to the rule; and

(8) the rules will not affect this state's economy.

Comments on the proposed rule or information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable data, research or analysis, may be submitted to Dr. Brandon Griggs, Assistant Commissioner for College and Career Advising, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711-2788, or via email at collegeandcareeradvising@highered.texas.gov. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code, Section 51.762, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules for the Common Admission Application Forms, and Section 61.0731, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to establish rules to implement Free College Application Week.

The proposed amendment affects Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter A.

§4.10. Common Admission Application Forms.

(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings:

(1) Apply Texas Advisory Committee--An advisory committee composed of representatives of general academic teaching institutions, community college districts, public state colleges, and public technical institutes, authorized by Texas Education Code, §51.762 and established in accordance with Board rules, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, §§1.128 - 1.134 of this title (relating to Apply Texas Advisory Committee), to provide the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board assistance in developing and implementing admissions application forms and procedures.

(2) Apply Texas System--The state's system for applying for admission to Texas public institutions of higher education. The System includes an access portal for completing common application forms; help desks to provide users assistance; and a portal through which Texas high school counselors access status data regarding student progress in applying for admission to and financial aid for college.

(3) Private or Independent Institutions of Higher Education--As defined by Texas Education Code, §61.003.

(b) Acceptance of Admission Applications.

(1) Public community colleges, public state colleges, and public technical institutes shall accept, and prominently post on their website freshman and all relevant undergraduate [transfer] applications submitted using the Board's electronic common admission application forms.

(2) General academic teaching institutions shall accept and prominently post on their website freshman and all relevant undergraduate [transfer] applications submitted using either the Board's electronic common admission application or printed forms.

(3) Private or independent institutions of higher education that use the Common Application Form shall accept and make available on their website all applicable undergraduate applications submitted using the Board's electronic common admission application forms.

(c) Common Application Forms.

(1) General application information provided on the common application form shall include:

(A) biographical information including gender, ethnicity, and date of birth;

(B) educational information including coursework, extracurriculars, community and volunteer service, and awards/honors;

(C) residency; and

(D) certification of information.

(2) Adjustments to Paper Forms. When sending a printed common application form to a student with or without other materials, an institution shall not alter the form in any way and shall include instructions for completing the form, general application information, and instructions for accessing a list of deadlines for all institutions.

(d) Outreach to Public High Schools.

(1) The Coordinating Board shall seek advice and recommendation(s) from high school counselors representative of diverse Texas public school districts regarding the common application and the Apply Texas System.

(2) The Coordinating Board shall ensure that copies of the freshman common admission application forms and information for their use are available to appropriate personnel at each Texas public high school. The Coordinating Board will work with institutions and high schools to ensure that all high schools have access to either the printed or electronic common application forms.

(e) Data to be Collected.

(1) Common application forms are to include questions needed for determining an applicant's residence status with regard to higher education and other information the Board considers appropriate.

(2) Each general academic teaching institution, public community college, public state college, and public technical institute shall collect information regarding gender, race/ethnicity, and date of birth as part of the application process and report this information to the Coordinating Board. Common application forms do not have to be the source of those data.

(3) Institutions of higher education may require an applicant to submit additional information within a reasonable time after the institution has received a common application form.

(f) Publicity. The Board shall publicize in both electronic and printed formats the availability of the common admission forms.

(g) Subcontract for Technical Support. The Coordinating Board shall enter into a contract with a public institution of higher education or third-party vendor to maintain the electronic common application system for use by the public in applying for admission to participating institutions and for distribution of the electronic application to the participating institutions designated by the applicant.

(h) Costs.

(1) Participating institutions may charge a reasonable fee for the filing of a common application form.

(2) Operating costs of the system may be paid for by all institutions required to use the common application plus independent and health-related institutions that contract to use the electronic application.

(3) Each participating institution may pay a portion of the cost based on the percentage of its enrollment compared to the total enrollment of all participating institutions based on the certified enrollment data of the most recent fall semester. The Coordinating Board will monitor the cost of the system and notify the institutions on an annual basis of their share of the cost. Billings for the services for the coming year will be calculated and sent to the institutions by September 1 of each fiscal year and payments must be received no later than December 1 of each fiscal year.

(4) The Coordinating Board may send participating institutions reminders of payment amounts and the due date. Institutions failing to pay their share of the cost by the due date may be denied access to in-coming application data until such time that payments are received.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600066

Douglas Brock

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6226


SUBCHAPTER C. TEXAS SUCCESS INITIATIVE

19 TAC §4.52

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter C, §4.52, concerning Applicability. Specifically, this amendment will reinstate the applicability of Texas Success Initiative (TSI), so institutions of higher education may follow best practices in assessing high school students regarding their readiness to engage with college-level coursework, to enable appropriate placements, and to provide targeted and aligned interventions and support to help ensure students' positive experiences with, and successful completion of, the college course.

Texas Education Code, Section 51.344, provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules to implement the provisions of Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, Subchapter F-1, concerning the Texas Success Initiative.

Rule 4.52, Applicability, is amended by deleting §4.52(4) for the purpose to reinstate the applicability of TSI to all high school students, so institutions of higher education may follow best practices in assessing students regarding their readiness to engage with college-level coursework, to enable appropriate placements, and to provide targeted and aligned interventions and support to help ensure students' positive experiences with, and successful completion of, the college course.

Daniel R. Perez, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Innovation and Success, has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, there will not be any fiscal implications to state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

There is no impact on small businesses, micro businesses, and rural communities. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

Daniel R. Perez, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Innovation and Success, has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be increased efficiency and effectiveness of student assessment and placement. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed.

Government Growth Impact Statement

(1) the rules will not create or eliminate a government program;

(2) implementation of the rules will not require the creation or elimination of employee positions;

(3) implementation of the rules will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency;

(4) the rules will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency;

(5) the rules will not create a new rule;

(6) the rules will not limit an existing rule;

(7) the rules will not change the number of individuals subject to the rule; and

(8) the rules will not affect this state's economy.

Comments on the proposed rule or information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable data, research or analysis, may be submitted to Dr. Suzanne Morales-Vale, Senior Director, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78701, or Suzanne.Morales-Vale@highered.texas.gov. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code, Section 51.344, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules to implement the provisions of Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, Subchapter F-1, concerning the Texas Success Initiative.

The proposed amendment affects Texas Education Code, Chapter 51, Subchapter F-1.

§4.52. Applicability.

(a) Except as set out in subsection (b) of this section, this subchapter applies to each entering undergraduate student not otherwise exempt under §4.54 of this subchapter (relating to Exemption).

(b) This subchapter does not apply to the following students, and an institution shall not require these students to demonstrate college readiness pursuant to this subchapter. To verify qualification under §4.52(b)(7)(8)(9), eligibility should be determined at each registration period. The following figure contains the full list of student categories to whom this subchapter does not apply.

Figure: 19 TAC §4.52(b) (.pdf)

[Figure: 19 TAC §4.52(b)]

(1) A student who has earned an associate or baccalaureate degree from an institution of higher education;

(2) A student who transfers to an institution of higher education from a private or independent institution of higher education or an accredited out-of-state institution of higher education and who has satisfactorily completed college-level coursework in the corresponding subject area, as transcribed or otherwise determined by the receiving institution;

(3) A student who is enrolled in a certificate program of one year or less at a public junior college, a public technical institute, or a public state college;

[(4) A student enrolled in high school who is a non-degree-seeking student as defined in §4.53(8) of this subchapter (relating to Definitions);]

(4) [(5)] A student who is serving on active duty as a member of the armed forces of the United States, the Texas National Guard, or as a member of a reserve component of the armed forces of the United States; [or]

(5) [(6)] A student who on or after August 1, 1990, was honorably discharged, retired, or released from active duty as a member of the armed forces of the United States or the Texas National Guard or service as a member of a reserve component of the armed forces of the United States; or

(6) [(7)] A student who is:

(A) certified as an emergency medical technician under Chapter 773, Health and Safety Code; and

(B) employed more than 20 hours a week by a political subdivision, according to Texas Local Government Code §172.003;

(7) [(8)] A student who is employed more than 20 hours a week as fire protection personnel by Section 419.021, Government Code; or

(8) [(9)] A student who is elected, appointed, or employed more than 20 hours a week to serve as a peace officer described by Article 2A.001, Code of Criminal Procedure, or other law.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600068

Douglas Brock

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6299


CHAPTER 22. STUDENT FINANCIAL AID PROGRAMS

SUBCHAPTER L. TOWARD EXCELLENCE, ACCESS, AND SUCCESS (TEXAS) GRANT PROGRAM

19 TAC §§22.226 - 22.230, 22.233 - 22.236, 22.241

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to, Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 22, Subchapter L, §§22.226 - 22.230, 22.233, 22.234, 22.236, 22.241, and new §22.235, concerning the Toward EXcellence, Access, and Success (TEXAS) Grant Program (Program). Specifically, the amendments and new section will amend definitions, student eligibility, prioritization criteria, and program allocations to ensure alignment with statutory changes made by House Bill (HB) 3041, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, which became effective June 20, 2025, as well as Riders 24 and 60 in the Coordinating Board's bill pattern of the General Appropriations Act (Senate Bill 1), 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session. The Coordinating Board convened a negotiated rulemaking committee to consider proposed amendments to §22.233 and §22.236, and the proposed new §22.235. The committee reached consensus on all items, and, unless otherwise stated, the proposed rule substantively reflects the committee's determinations. The Coordinating Board will make reports of negotiated rulemaking committees available upon request.

The Coordinating Board is authorized by Texas Education Code, §56.303, to adopt rules necessary for the administration of the Program.

Rule 22.226, Definitions, is amended by replacing the term "continuation grant" with the more conventionally used "renewal grant" and by adding the terms "nontraditional secondary education" and "priority Student Aid Index level." Conforming changes are made throughout the subchapter to reflect the change in terminology to "renewal grant." The definition of "nontraditional secondary education," included to implement HB 3041, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, aligns with the definition for the same term in TEC, §51.9241. The definition of "priority Student Aid Index level" refers to the level described by TEC, §56.303(e), and calculated each year by the Coordinating Board. Additional references to this figure in the proposed rule warrant the creation of a defined term to ensure consistent usage. Nonsubstantive changes are made to the definition of "Target Grant Amount" to update a rule reference to reflect changes to program allocations and to the definition of "Tuition" to replace an outdated rule reference.

Rule 22.227, Eligible Institutions, is amended to make conforming changes relating to the term "renewal grant."

Rule 22.228, Eligible Students, is amended by adding reference in subsection (a)(6)(A) to students who successfully completed a nontraditional secondary education, ensuring these students are considered eligible consistent with HB 3041, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session. Subsection (d) is added to codify the Coordinating Board's existing practice of considering a student enrolled in combined baccalaureate-master's degree programs as "enrolled in a baccalaureate program" (and therefore potentially eligible for the Program), provided the student's institution considers the student an undergraduate for federal financial aid purposes. Other nonsubstantive and conforming changes are included to improve the readability of the rule.

Rule 22.229, Satisfactory Academic Progress, is amended by eliminating subsection (b)(3), which had been inadvertently retained during prior rule revisions. This provision cannot apply to a student as the Program is currently administered, and its elimination does not represent a change in administration of the Program. Other nonsubstantive and conforming changes are included to improve the readability of the rule. Similarly, subsection (d) also is unnecessary, as a student's completion rate is no longer calculated as part of satisfactory academic progress criteria for this program, and is eliminated.

Rule 22.230, Discontinuation of Eligibility or Non-Eligibility, is amended to make conforming changes relating to the term "renewal grant."

Rule 22.233, Priority in Grants to Students, is amended by adding additional priority considerations to conform with the requirements of Riders 24 and 60 of the General Appropriations Act (Senate Bill 1), 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session. Subsection (b) is added, directing institutions to prioritize students who graduated in the top 25 percent of their high school graduating class in one of the two prior years for initial year grants. This provision, as proposed, deviates slightly from the determination of the negotiated rulemaking committee; whereas the committee reached consensus on proposed rule language that allowed for institutions to determine which students met the top 25 percent standard, the Coordinating Board has revised this language to instead allow for an institutional policy for determining top 25 percent status for students whose high schools do not rank students. This aligns with the requirements of Rider 24 and conforms to the legislative intent of providing greater predictability in the offering of state financial aid to high-performing students.

Subsection (c) is added, directing institutions to prioritize students who establish initial year eligibility via the Texas Educational Opportunity Grant (TEOG) pathway described by §22.228(a)(6)(D), which implements the legislative intent regarding predictability associated with Rider 60.

Subsections (f) and (g) are added to further clarify expectations related to top 25 percent and TEOG pathway students. Subsection (f) states that each institution shall ensure that all eligible students who graduate in the top 25 percent of their high school class, have a Student Aid Index at or below the priority level described by §22.233(e), and apply for financial aid before the June 1 receive an initial year grant. The negotiated rulemaking committee reached consensus on this subsection using the state priority deadline as the deadline by which a student must apply for financial aid to be considered for the guarantee described by subsection (f). After the committee convened, however, the Coordinating Board determined that using the priority deadline for this purpose was misaligned with the legislative intent of Rider 24. Use of June 1 preserves the committee's preference for a deadline for resource allocation purposes but aligns with both the legislative intent of the Rider (by occurring after the vast majority of applicable students would have graduated high school and could demonstrate having graduated in the top 25 of their class) and aligns with the graduation requirement described by TEC, §28.0256.

Similarly, subsection (g) states that each institution shall ensure that all eligible students qualifying via the TEOG pathway and who have a Student Aid Index at or below the priority level receive an initial year grant, specifying that institutions may use any funds (not only the restricted funds allocated via §22.235) to accomplish this requirement.

Subsection (h) is amended to include references to students who complete a nontraditional secondary education. These students are still subject to the priority model described by subsection (h), as they can plausibly meet three of the four listed criteria (only two must be met). Other nonsubstantive and conforming changes are included to improve the readability of the rule.

Subsection (i) clarifies that an institution, in establishing whether a student has "present[ed] evidence of successful completion of a nontraditional secondary education" in subsection (h)(1), cannot require any additional evidence or documentation beyond what is required for admissions purposes. Moreover, it clarifies that admission to the institution on the basis of successful completion of a nontraditional secondary education fulfills this requirement.

Rule 22.234, Grant Amounts, is amended by clarifying subsection (a) to note that a TEXAS Grant may not be reduced by any gift aid for which a person is eligible, unless the total amount of the grant plus any gift aid is greater than the student's financial need. This change reflects greater alignment with the program statute. Subsection (d) is redundant with §22.228(c)(3) and is removed.

Rule 22.235, Allocation of Funds- TEOG Pathway, is created to establish the means by which the appropriated funds restricted by Rider 60 are allocated to participating institutions. Subsection (a) describes the methodology, which distributes available funds proportionally among participating institutions based on each institution's share of students meeting the criteria listed in subsection (a)(1). Subsection (b) describes the nature of the funds restriction, limiting use of the allocated funds under the section to initial year grants for students qualifying via the TEOG pathway. Subsection (c) describes the means by which the Coordinating Board will conduct this allocation process as a two-year allocation, as it does with many other state grant programs, starting in Fiscal Year 2028. Subsection (d) notes that institutions' Financial Aid Database submissions are the data source for the allocation. Subsection (e) describes the data review, a preliminary process by which the Coordinating Board supplies data to institutions for review and comment prior to publishing final allocations. Subsection (f) describes the means by which the Coordinating Board will reduce funding levels in the event of an unexpected funding decrease, aligning with a like provision in §22.236.

Rule 22.236, Allocation of Funds - General, is amended to reflect changes to the general program allocation to meet the requirements of Rider 24. Subsection (a) describes the allocation methodology, which differs from the current allocation methodology in two ways. First, a new top 25 percent portion of the allocation is added in subsection (a)(2). This portion of the allocation occurs after the renewal grants portion in subsection (a)(1), which is unchanged. For this portion of the calculation, using Financial Aid Database and CBM00B university admissions report submissions, the Coordinating Board will determine the number of students at each participating institution meeting the criteria described in subsection (a)(2)(A) in the prior-prior year, and multiply that figure by 125 percent of the Target Grant Amount. That figure was selected as an acknowledgement of the legislative intent of the Rider, which is to ensure every institution has sufficient funding to meet the requirement to offer grants to all eligible top 25 percent students. The use of the 125 percent of the Target Grant Amount is for allocation purposes only and does not imply a requirement regarding the amount of any student's grant. The other substantive change to the methodology described in subsection (a) is the exclusion of top 25 percent and TEOG pathway students from the Remaining Initial Grants portion of the calculation in subsection (a)(3). The proportional method of this part of the calculation is unchanged, but these students were removed from the calculation because they are considered elsewhere in the allocation, either in §22.235 (for TEOG pathway) or §22.236(a)(2) (for top 25 percent).

Subsection (b) is added to describe how the general allocation would be conducted in the event that insufficient funds were appropriated for the Program to fully fund the renewal and top 25 percent portions of the calculation. In such a case, available funds for that portion of the calculation (starting with the renewal grants, and then top 25 percent in keeping with grant priority rules) would be distributed proportionally. Subsection (c) describes the means by which the Coordinating Board will conduct this allocation process as a two-year allocation, as it does with many other state grant programs, starting in Fiscal Year 2028. Subsection (d) notes that institutions' Financial Aid Database submissions are the data source for the allocation. Subsection (e) describes the data review, a preliminary process by which the Coordinating Board supplies data to institutions for review and comment prior to publishing final allocations.

Rule 22.241, Tolling of Eligibility for Initial Year Grant, is amended to make conforming changes relating to the term "renewal grant" and to rule citations affected by other proposed changes.

Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, has determined that for each of the first five years the sections are in effect there would be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

There is no impact on small businesses, micro businesses, and rural communities. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be the enhanced financial aid predictability for eligible high-performing and transfer students. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Government Growth Impact Statement

(1) the rules will not create or eliminate a government program;

(2) implementation of the rules will not require the creation or elimination of employee positions;

(3) implementation of the rules will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency;

(4) the rules will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency;

(5) the rules will not create a new rule;

(6) the rules will not limit an existing rule;

(7) the rules will not change the number of individuals subject to the rule; and

(8) the rules will not affect this state's economy.

Comments on the proposed rule or information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable data, research or analysis, may be submitted to Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711-2788, or via email at SFAPPolicy@highered.texas.gov. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendment and new section are proposed under Texas Education Code, Section 56.303, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules necessary for the administration of the Program.

The proposed amendment and new section affects Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 22, Subchapter L.

§22.226. Definitions.

In addition to the words and terms defined in §22.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions), the following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

[(1) Continuation Grant--A TEXAS Grant offered to a person who has previously received an initial year grant.]

(1) [(2)] Entering Undergraduate--A student enrolled in the first thirty semester credit hours or their equivalent, excluding hours taken during dual enrollment in high school and courses for which the student received credit through examination.

(2) [(3)] Initial Year Grant--The TEXAS Grant offered in the student's first year in the TEXAS Grant Program.

(3) Nontraditional Secondary Education--A course of study at the secondary school level in a nonaccredited private school setting, including a home school.

(4) Priority Student Aid Index Level--An amount calculated annually by the Coordinating Board equal to 60 percent of the average statewide amount of tuition and required fees for resident students enrolled full-time in baccalaureate degree programs at general academic teaching institutions, excluding public state colleges, for the relevant academic year.

(5) [(4)] Prior-Prior Year--For allocation purposes, the state fiscal year that began two years earlier than the fiscal year for which the allocation is being calculated.

(6) [(5)] Program--The Toward EXcellence, Access and Success (TEXAS) Grant program.

(7) Renewal Grant--A TEXAS Grant offered to a person who has previously received an initial year grant.

(8) [(6)] Required Fees--A mandatory fee (required by statute) or discretionary fee (authorized by statute, imposed by the governing board of an institution of higher education) and that an institution of higher education charges to a student as a condition of enrollment at the institution of higher education or in a specific course.

(9) [(7)] Target Grant Amount--An amount set by the Coordinating Board, in consultation with institutions of higher education participating in the TEXAS Grant Program, and used as the recommended average grant amount for the TEXAS Grant Program for a biennium and in establishing renewal grant and initial year grant for top 25 percent student allocations to participating institutions of higher education as described in §22.236(a)(1) and (2) of this chapter (relating to Allocation [and Reallocation] of Funds - General).

(10) [(8)] Tuition--Statutory tuition, designated and/or Board-authorized tuition, as defined in §13.121 [§13.142] of this title (related to Definitions).

§22.227. Eligible Institutions.

(a) Eligibility.

(1) Institutions eligible to make initial year and renewal [continuation] grants in the program are medical or dental units and general academic teaching institutions, other than the public state colleges, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions).

(2) No participating institution may, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, or disability exclude an individual from participation in, or deny the benefits of the program described in this subchapter.

(3) Each participating institution must follow the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI (Public Law 88-353) in avoiding discrimination in admissions or employment.

(b) Approval.

(1) Agreement. Each eligible institution must enter into an agreement with the Coordinating Board, the terms of which shall be prescribed by the Commissioner, prior to being approved to participate in the program.

(2) Approval Deadline. An eligible institution must enter into an agreement with the Coordinating Board and indicate an intent to participate in the program by April 1 in order for qualified students enrolled in that institution to be eligible to receive grants in the following fiscal year.

(c) Responsibilities. Participating institutions are required to abide by the General Provisions outlined in subchapter A of this chapter.

§22.228. Eligible Students.

(a) Initial Grants. To be eligible to receive [qualify for] an initial year grant, a person must:

(1) be enrolled in a baccalaureate program at a participating institution;

(2) be a resident of Texas, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions);

(3) show financial need, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter;

(4) have applied for financial aid through the completion of the Federal Application for Federal Student Aid or, if the student is not eligible for federal financial aid, the Texas Application for State Financial Aid;

(5) meet applicable standards outlined in §22.3 of this chapter (relating to Student Compliance with Selective Service Registration); and

(6) Except as provided under §22.231 of this subchapter (relating to Hardship Provisions), to receive an initial year grant, an otherwise eligible person must enroll in a baccalaureate degree program at a participating institution on at least a three-quarter time basis as:

(A) an entering undergraduate student not later than the end of the sixteenth month after the calendar month in which the person graduated from high school or successfully completed a nontraditional secondary education, as defined in §22.226 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions); [or]

(B) an entering undergraduate student who entered military service not later than the first anniversary of the date of high school graduation and enrolled in an eligible institution no later than twelve months after being released from active duty military service with an Honorable Discharge, General Discharge under Honorable Conditions, or Honorable Separation or Release from Active Duty, as documented by the Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD214) issued by the Department of Defense;

(C) an undergraduate student not later than the end of the twelfth month after the calendar month in which the student received an associate degree; or

(D) an undergraduate student who has:

(i) previously attended another institution of higher education, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter;

(ii) received an initial Texas Educational Opportunity Grant under subchapter M of this chapter (relating to Texas Educational Opportunity Grant Program) for the 2014 fall semester or a subsequent semester;

(iii) completed at least twenty-four semester credit hours at any institution(s) of higher education or private or independent institution(s) of higher education, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter;

(iv) earned an overall grade point average of at least 2.5 on a four-point scale or the equivalent on all course work previously attempted; and

(v) [has] never previously received a TEXAS Grant.

(b) Renewal [Continuation] Grants. To be eligible to receive a renewal [continuation] grant through the TEXAS Grant Program, a student must:

(1) have previously received an initial year grant through this Program;

(2) show financial need, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter;

(3) be enrolled at least three-quarter time unless granted a hardship waiver of this requirement under §22.231 of this subchapter (relating to Hardship Provisions);

(4) be enrolled in a baccalaureate program at a participating institution;

(5) make satisfactory academic progress towards a baccalaureate degree at the participating institution, as defined in §22.229 of this subchapter (relating to Satisfactory Academic Progress); and

(6) meet applicable standards outlined in §22.3 of this chapter (relating to Student Compliance with Selective Service Registration).

(c) If a student's eligibility was based on the expectation that the student would complete a high school diploma or associate degree in time to meet the requirements for Program eligibility, and the student failed to do so, then, in order to resume eligibility, such a student must:

(1) receive an associate degree;

(2) meet all other qualifications for a TEXAS Grant;

(3) if required to do so by the institution through which the TEXAS Grant was made, repay the amount of the TEXAS Grant that was previously received; and

(4) enroll in a higher-level undergraduate degree program at a participating institution not later than the twelfth month after the month the student received an associate degree.

(d) For the purposes of this section, a student enrolled in a combined baccalaureate-master's degree program is considered to be enrolled in a baccalaureate program during the period in which the student's institution considers the student an undergraduate for federal financial aid purposes.

§22.229. Satisfactory Academic Progress.

(a) To be eligible to receive [qualify for] a renewal [continuation] grant after the academic year in which a person receives an initial year grant, each recipient of the TEXAS Grant shall meet the academic progress requirements of his or her institution.

(b) To be eligible to receive a subsequent grant after he or she receives a renewal [continuation] grant, a recipient shall, unless granted a hardship waiver of this requirement in accordance with §22.231 of this subchapter (relating to Hardship Provisions):

(1) complete at least twenty-four semester credit hours in his or her most recent academic year; and[,]

(2) maintain an overall grade point average of at least 2.5 on a four point scale or its equivalent, for all coursework attempted at an institution of higher education or private or independent institution of higher education, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions).

[(3) An entering undergraduate student enrolling in a participating institution for the second or later semester in a given academic year meets the semester-credit-hour requirement outlined in paragraph (1) of this subsection for continuing in the program if he or she completes at least twelve semester credit hours or its equivalent during that semester.]

(c) The calculation of a student's GPA is to be completed in accordance with §22.10 of this chapter (relating to Grade Point Average Calculations for Satisfactory Academic Progress).

[(d) The completion rate calculations may be made in keeping with institutional policies.]

§22.230. Discontinuation of Eligibility or Non-Eligibility.

(a) A student may not receive a TEXAS Grant while concurrently receiving a Texas Educational Opportunity Grant or Texas Transfer Grant.

(b) A student may not receive a TEXAS Grant after having already being granted a baccalaureate degree.

(c) A student may not receive a TEXAS Grant for a semester in which he or she is enrolled for fewer than six hours.

(d) Unless granted a hardship postponement in accordance with §22.231 of this subchapter (relating to Hardship Provisions), eligibility for a TEXAS Grant for a student whose eligibility for an initial year TEXAS Grant was not based on the receipt of an associate degree ends:

(1) five years from the start of the semester in which the student received his or her first disbursement of an initial year TEXAS Grant, if the student is enrolled in a degree program of four years or less;

(2) six years from the start of the semester in which the student received his or her first disbursement of an initial year TEXAS Grant, if the student is enrolled in a degree program of more than four years.

(e) Unless granted a hardship postponement in accordance with §22.231 of this subchapter, eligibility for a TEXAS Grant for a student whose eligibility was based on receiving an associate degree ends:

(1) three years from the start of the semester in which the student received his or her first disbursement of an initial year TEXAS Grant if the student is enrolled in a degree program of four years or less;

(2) four years from the start of the semester in which the student received his or her first disbursement of an initial year TEXAS Grant if the student is enrolled in a degree program of more than four years.

(f) A student's eligibility ends one year from the date of the semester in which the student received his or her first disbursement of an initial year TEXAS Grant, if the student's eligibility was based on the expectation that the student would complete the initial year grant requirements as outlined in §22.228 of this subchapter (relating to Eligible Students), but the student failed to do so. However, if such a student later receives an associate degree and again qualifies for TEXAS Grants, as described by §22.228(c) of this subchapter, he or she can receive an additional three years of eligibility if enrolled in a degree program of four years or less, or an additional four years if enrolled in a degree program of more than four years.

(g) A student's eligibility for a TEXAS Grant ends once he or she has attempted 150 semester credit hours or the equivalent unless the student is granted a hardship extension in accordance with §22.231(d) of this subchapter.

(h) A person is not eligible to receive an initial year or renewal [continuation] grant if the person has been convicted of a felony or of an offense under Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code (Texas Controlled Substances Act), or under the law of any other jurisdiction involving a controlled substance as defined by Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code, unless the person has met the other applicable eligibility requirements under this subchapter and has:

(1) received a certificate of discharge by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice or a correctional facility or completed a period of probation ordered by a court, and at least two years have elapsed from the date of the receipt or completion; or

(2) been pardoned, had the record of the offense expunged from the person's record, or otherwise been released from the resulting ineligibility to receive a TEXAS Grant.

(i) Other than as described in §22.231 of this subchapter, if a person fails to meet any of the requirements for receiving a renewal [continuation] grant as outlined in §22.228(b) of this subchapter after completion of any semester, the person may not receive a TEXAS Grant until he or she completes a semester while not receiving a TEXAS Grant and meets all the requirements as outlined in §22.228(b) of this subchapter as of the end of that semester.

§22.233. Priority in Grants to Students.

(a) If appropriations for the program are insufficient to allow grants to all eligible students, priority shall be given to those students demonstrating [continuing TEXAS Grant] eligibility for a renewal grant pursuant to §22.228(b) of this subchapter (relating to Eligible Students).

(b) In determining who will receive an initial year grant, an institution shall give priority to those students who graduated in the top 25 percent of their high school graduating class in one of the two prior academic years. An institution may establish a procedure by which it determines whether a student whose high school does not rank students is described by this subsection.

(c) In determining who will receive an initial year grant, an institution shall give priority to those students who establish eligibility for an initial grant under §22.228(a)(6)(D) of this subchapter.

(d) [(b)] In determining who will receive an initial year grant [student eligibility for a TEXAS Grant pursuant to §22.228(a) of this subchapter], priority shall be given to those students who demonstrate the greatest financial need at the time the offer is made.

(e) [(c)] In determining who will receive an initial year grant [student eligibility for a TEXAS Grant pursuant to §22.228(a) of this subchapter], priority shall be given to those students who have a Student Aid Index at or below the Priority Student Aid Index level, as defined in §22.226 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions) [that does not exceed 60 percent of the average statewide amount of tuition and required fees for general academic teaching institutions for the relevant academic year].

(f) Each institution shall ensure that an eligible student receives an initial grant under this subchapter if the student:

(1) is described by both subsections (b) and (e) of this section; and

(2) applies for financial aid, as described by §22.228(a)(4) of this subchapter, by June 1 prior to the applicable fiscal year.

(g) Each institution shall ensure that an eligible student who is described by both subsections (c) and (e) of this section receives an initial grant under this subchapter. An institution may use any funds allocated under this subchapter to meet this requirement.

(h) [(d)] In determining initial student eligibility for a TEXAS Grant pursuant to §22.228(a) of this subchapter, priority shall be given to those students who:

(1) graduated [graduate] or are on track to graduate from a public or accredited private high school or who present evidence of successful completion of a nontraditional secondary education, as defined in §22.226 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions) in Texas [on or after May 1, 2013,] and complete or are on track to complete the Foundation High School program, or its equivalent as amended in keeping with Texas Education Code, §56.009; and [. The person must also be on track to]

(2) have accomplished, or are on track to accomplish, any two or more of the following at the time a TEXAS Grant was offered:

(A) [(1)] successful completion of the course requirements of the international baccalaureate diploma program, or earning of the equivalent of at least twelve semester credit hours of college credit in high school through courses described in Texas Education Code, §28.009(a)(1), (2), and (3), or if graduating prior to September 1, 2020, graduate under the Recommended or Advanced high school curriculum specified in the Texas Education Code, §28.025 as it existed as of January 1, 2013, and the rules promulgated thereunder by the State Board of Education;

(B) [(2)] satisfaction of the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) college readiness benchmarks prescribed by the Coordinating Board under §4.57 of this title (relating to Texas Success Initiative Assessment College Readiness Standards) [Texas Education Code, §51.334] on any assessment instrument designated by the Coordinating Board under that section or qualification for an exemption as described by §4.54 of this title (relating to Exemption) [Texas Education Code, §51.338(b), (c), or (d)];

(C) [(3)] graduation in the top one-third of the person's high school graduating class or graduation from high school with a grade point average of at least 3.0 on a four-point scale or the equivalent; or

(D) [(4)] completion for high school credit of at least one advanced mathematics course following the successful completion of an Algebra II course, or at least one advanced career and technical or technical applications course;

(i) For the purposes of subsection (h)(1) of this section, an institution may not require a student to present additional evidence or documentation of successful completion of a nontraditional secondary education beyond what is required for the student to demonstrate qualification for admission to the institution. A student who has been admitted to the institution based on successful completion of a nontraditional secondary education is considered to have presented evidence of completion.

(j) [(e)] If funds remain after TEXAS Grants are offered to all students meeting the criteria in subsection (h) [(d)] of this section, remaining funds may be offered to persons who are otherwise eligible for TEXAS Grants.

§22.234. Grant Amounts.

(a) The amount of a TEXAS Grant offered through an eligible institution may not be reduced by any gift aid for which the person receiving the grant is eligible, unless the total amount of a person's grant plus any gift aid [other than loans] received equals or exceeds the student's financial need.

(b) The Coordinating Board shall determine and announce the maximum amount of a TEXAS Grant not later than the final day of January prior to the start of each fiscal year. The calculation of the maximum amount per semester will be based on the mandates contained in Texas Education Code, §56.307. However, no student's TEXAS Grant shall be greater than the amount of the student's financial need.

(c) A participating institution may not charge a person receiving a TEXAS Grant through that institution, an amount of tuition and required fees in excess of the amount of the TEXAS Grant received by the person in that semester unless it also provides the student sufficient aid other than loans to meet his or her full tuition and required fees for that semester. Nor may it deny admission to or enrollment in the institution based on a person's eligibility to receive or actual receipt of a TEXAS Grant.

[(d) If a student is determined to have failed to complete the necessary High School Program or Associate Degree upon which eligibility for the program was determined, a participating institution may require the student to forgo or repay the amount of the student's initial year grant.]

(d) [(e)] Grant calculations and disbursements are to be completed in accordance with the General Provisions outlined in subchapter A of this chapter.

§22.235. Allocation of Funds - TEOG Pathway.

(a) Allocation Methodology. To the extent that funds are appropriated for the Program specifically to offer grants to eligible students who established eligibility for an initial grant under §22.228(a)(6)(D) of this subchapter (relating to Eligible Students), an institution's share of funds appropriated for that purpose will equal:

(1) The number of students who were reported in the Prior-Prior Year as:

(A) enrolled as undergraduate students;

(B) Residents of Texas, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions);

(C) enrolled at least three-quarter-time;

(D) meeting the criteria described in §22.228(a)(6)(D) of this subchapter; and

(E) having a Student Aid Index at or below the Priority Student Aid Index Level, as defined in §22.226 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions); divided by

(2) The sum of all participating institutions' reported students described by paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(b) Funds Restricted.

(1) Any funds allocated under this section may be used only to offer Initial Year TEXAS Grants to students who established eligibility for the program under §22.228(a)(6)(D) of this subchapter.

(2) The provisions of §22.11 of this chapter (relating to Authority to Transfer Funds) do not apply to funds allocated under this section.

(c) Two-Year Allocation. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2028, allocations for both years of the state appropriations' biennium will be completed at the same time. The three most recent certified Financial Aid Database submissions will be utilized to forecast the data used in the calculation of the allocation for the second year of the biennium. Institutions will receive notification of their allocations for both years of the biennium at the same time.

(d) Data Source. For the purposes of subsection (a) of this section, the Coordinating Board shall use each institution's certified Financial Aid Database submissions for the applicable year(s) as the data source for its calculations.

(e) Notice and Data Review. The Coordinating Board will conduct a preliminary data review, the results of which will be shared with all participating institutions for comment and verification prior to the publication of final allocations. Institutions will be given ten working days, beginning the day of the data review notice's distribution and excluding State holidays, to confirm that the data review report accurately reflects the data they submitted or to advise the Coordinating Board of any inaccuracies.

(f) Reductions in Funding.

(1) If annual funding for the program is reduced after the start of a fiscal year, the Coordinating Board may take steps to help distribute the impact of reduced funding across all participating institutions by an across-the-board percentage decrease in all institutions' allocations.

(2) If annual funding is reduced prior to the start of a fiscal year, the Coordinating Board may recalculate the allocations according to the allocation methodology outlined in this rule for the affected fiscal year based on available dollars.

§22.236. Allocation of Funds - General

(a) Allocation Methodology. Except as provided in §22.235 of this subchapter (relating to Allocation of Funds- TEOG Pathway), an institution's share of available funds for the Program shall be determined in three stages. An institution's general allocation will be the sum of the output of each of the stages.

(1) Renewal Grants. Each eligible institution's renewal grants component of the allocation is calculated by multiplying:

(A) The sum of:

(i) The number of Initial Year Grant recipients at the institution in the Prior-Prior Year (i.e., two fiscal years before the year for which the allocation is being made), multiplied by the percentage of Initial Year Grant recipients at the institution in the year prior to Prior-Prior Year who received a Renewal Grant in the Prior-Prior Year; and

(ii) The number of Renewal Grant recipients at the institution in the Prior-Prior Year, multiplied by the percentage of Renewal Grant recipients at the institution in the year prior to Prior-Prior Year who received a Renewal Grant in the Prior-Prior Year; and

(B) The lesser of:

(i) The institution's average TEXAS Grant amount in the Prior-Prior Year; or

(ii) The Target Grant Amount for the fiscal year for which allocations are occurring.

(2) Initial Grants- Top 25 percent. Each eligible institution's initial grants component of the allocation for students graduating in the Top 25 percent of their class is calculated by multiplying:

(A) The number of students who were reported in the Prior-Prior Year as:

(i) enrolled as entering undergraduate students;

(ii) Residents of Texas, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions);

(iii) enrolled at least three-quarter-time;

(iv) having graduated in the top 25 percent of the student's high school graduating class in one of the two school years preceding the Prior-Prior Year; and

(v) having a Student Aid Index at or below the Priority Student Aid Index Level, as defined in §22.226 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions); and

(B) One hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the Target Grant Amount for the fiscal year for which allocations are occurring.

(3) Remaining Initial Grants. Available funds remaining after calculating the first two components of each institution's allocation shall be distributed proportionally. An institution's proportion of the remaining allocation is based on the sum of the number of students who were reported in the Prior-Prior Year as:

(A) enrolled as undergraduate students who had not yet received a baccalaureate degree;

(B) residents of Texas, as defined in §22.1 of this chapter;

(C) enrolled at least three-quarter time;

(D) having a Student Aid Index at or below the Priority Student Aid Index Level, as defined in §22.226 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions); and

(E) either:

(i) a first-time enrolling freshman, excluding students described by subsection (a)(2)(A) of this section; or

(ii) an undergraduate transfer student who completed an associate degree within the prior twelve months to enrolling, excluding students described by §22.235(a)(1) of this subchapter (relating to Allocation of Funds- TEOG Pathway).

[(a) Allocations.]

[(1) The share of funds for each eligible institution will equal:]

[(A) the number of Initial Year TEXAS Grant recipients at the institution in the Prior-Prior Year multiplied by the percentage of Initial Year TEXAS Grant recipients in the year prior to the Prior-Prior Year who received a Continuation Grant in the Prior-Prior Year; plus the number of Continuation Grant TEXAS Grant recipients at the institution in the Prior-Prior Year multiplied by the percentage of Continuation Grant TEXAS Grant recipients in the year prior to the Prior-Prior Year who received a Continuation Grant in the Prior-Prior Year, multiplied by the institution's average TEXAS Grant award in the Prior-Prior Year, up to the amount of the Target Grant Amount for the fiscal year for which allocations are occurring; plus]

[(B) the institution's proportions of the remaining appropriation is based on the sum of the number of students who were reported as a first time enrolling freshman; or an undergraduate transfer student who completed an associate degree within the prior twelve months to enrolling; or an undergraduate transfer student who received an Initial TEOG grant for the Fall 2014 semester or later, has completed at least twenty-four semester credit hours, and has earned an overall GPA of at least 2.5 on a four-point scale on all course work previously attempted, and:]

[(i) were enrolled as undergraduate students and had not yet received a Bachelor's degree;]

[(ii) were identified as residents of Texas;]

[(iii) were enrolled at least three-quarter-time; and]

[(iv) had a 9-month Student Aid Index, calculated using federal methodology, that was less than or equal to the cap established for TEXAS Grant in the Prior-Prior Year.]

[(2) The TEXAS Grant allocation spreadsheet will be provided to the institutions for review and the institutions will be given ten working days, beginning the day of the notice's distribution and excluding State holidays, to confirm that the spreadsheet accurately reflects the data they submitted or to advise the Coordinating Board of any inaccuracies.]

(b) If appropriated funds for the Program are insufficient to allocate the full amounts calculated in subsections (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section, available funds for that portion of the calculation will be distributed proportionally, with each institution's share of the allocation being the amount calculated for that component of the allocation calculation divided by the sum of all participating institutions' calculated amount for that component of the allocation calculation.

(c) Two-Year Allocation. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2028, allocations for both years of the state appropriations' biennium will be completed at the same time. The three most recent certified Financial Aid Database submissions will be utilized to forecast the data used in the calculation of the allocation for the second year of the biennium. Institutions will receive notification of their allocations for both years of the biennium at the same time.

(d) Data Sources. For the purposes of subsection (a) of this section, the Coordinating Board shall use each institution's certified Financial Aid Database submissions for the applicable year(s) as the data source for its calculations, except that the Coordinating Board shall use the institution's CBM00B university admissions report submissions to identify the students meeting the criterion described in subsection (a)(2)(A)(iv) of this section.

(e) Notice and Data Review. The Coordinating Board will conduct a preliminary data review, the results of which will be shared with all participating institutions for comment and verification prior to the publication of final allocations. Institutions will be given ten working days, beginning the day of the data review notice's distribution and excluding State holidays, to confirm that the data review report accurately reflects the data they submitted or to advise the Coordinating Board of any inaccuracies.

(f) [(b)] Reductions in Funding.

(1) If annual funding for the program is reduced after the start of a fiscal year, the Coordinating Board may take steps to help distribute the impact of reduced funding across all participating institutions by an across-the-board percentage decrease in all institutions' allocations.

(2) If annual funding is reduced prior to the start of a fiscal year, the Coordinating Board may recalculate the allocations according to the allocation methodology outlined in this rule for the affected fiscal year based on available dollars.

§22.241. Tolling of Eligibility for Initial Year Grant.

(a) A person is eligible for consideration for an Initial Year grant under this subsection if the person was eligible for an initial year grant under §22.228 of this subchapter (relating to Eligible Students) in an academic year for which the Texas Legislature failed to appropriate sufficient funds to make initial year grant to at least 10 percent of the eligible student population, and:

(1) has not received a TEXAS Grant in the past;

(2) has not received a baccalaureate degree; and

(3) meets the eligibility requirements for a renewal [continuation] grant as described in §22.228(b) of this subchapter.

(b) A person who meets the requirements outlined in subsection (a) of this section:

(1) cannot be disqualified for a TEXAS Grant by changes in program requirements since the time he or she was originally eligible or by the amount of time that has passed since he or she was originally eligible;

(2) is to receive highest priority in the selection of recipients if he or she met the priority model requirements of §22.233(h) [§22.233(d)] of this title (relating to Priority in Grants to Students), when originally determined to be eligible;

(3) may continue receiving grants as long as he or she meets the requirements for such renewal [continuation] grants; and

(4) may not receive TEXAS Grants for prior academic years.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600069

Douglas Brock

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6365


CHAPTER 24. STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMS

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §24.1

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 24, Subchapter A, §24.1, concerning Definitions. Specifically, this amendment will extend the definition of "manageable debt" to apply to master's degree students.

The Coordinating Board is authorized by Texas Education Code, Chapter 52, Subchapter C, to adopt rules relating to its student loan programs.

Rule 24.1, Definitions, is amended by clarifying the definition of "manageable debt" by defining it as a concept that can be applied to any student, regardless of the type of credential the student is pursuing, as well as by providing additional detail- relating to timing and method- regarding the Coordinating Board's calculation of manageable debt levels. The underlying methodology for developing these levels is unchanged. The existing figure is removed, and manageable debt levels will be published separately from the rule in the future, which allows for use of up-to-date information. To improve rule alignment, the definition for "degree or certificate program" is eliminated and separated into two separate terms, each citing to a definition elsewhere in Coordinating Board rules.

Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, has determined that for each of the first five years the sections are in effect there would be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

There is no impact on small businesses, micro businesses, and rural communities. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be the greater alignment between agency operations and strategic goals regarding debt attainment. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Government Growth Impact Statement

(1) the rules will not create or eliminate a government program;

(2) implementation of the rules will not require the creation or elimination of employee positions;

(3) implementation of the rules will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency;

(4) the rules will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency;

(5) the rules will not create a new rule;

(6) the rules will not limit an existing rule;

(7) the rules will not change the number of individuals subject to the rule; and

(8) the rules will not affect this state's economy.

Comments on the proposed rule or information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable data, research or analysis, may be submitted to Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711-2788, or via email at SFAPPolicy@highered.texas.gov. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code, Chapter 52, Subchapter C, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules relating to its student loan programs.

The proposed amendment affects Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 24, Subchapter A.

§24.1. Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in chapter 24, shall have the following meanings, unless otherwise defined in a particular subchapter:

(1) Alternative Educator Certification Program--An approved educator preparation program, delivered by entities approved by the State Board for Educator Certification under the provisions of part 7, chapter 228 of this title (relating to Requirements for Educator Preparation Programs), specifically designed as an alternative to a traditional undergraduate certification program, for individuals already holding at least a baccalaureate degree.

(2) Board--The governing body of the agency known as the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

(3) Borrower--An individual who signs a student loan promissory note and thereby assumes liability for the debt and all fees associated with the note and who uses the proceeds of the loan to finance the individual's postsecondary education.

(4) Certificate Program--As defined in §2.3 of this title (relating to Definitions).

(5) [(4)] Commissioner--The Texas Commissioner of Higher Education.

(6) [(5)] Coordinating Board--The agency known as the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, including agency staff.

(7) [(6)] Cosigner--An individual who signs a student loan promissory note and thereby assumes liability for the debt and all fees and expenses associated with the note but who is not a direct beneficiary of the proceeds of the loan.

(8) [(7)] Cost of Attendance--An institution's estimate of the expenses incurred by a typical financial aid recipient in attending a particular institution of higher education. It includes direct educational costs (tuition and fees) as well as indirect costs (room and board, books and supplies, transportation, personal expenses, and other allowable costs for financial aid purposes).

(9) Degree Program--As defined in §2.3 of this title.

[(8) Degree or Certificate Program--A program of study leading to a baccalaureate degree, associate degree, or certificate.]

(10) [(9)] Favorable Credit Report Evaluation--A determination made by the Coordinating Board regarding a prospective borrower or cosigner's creditworthiness. For the purposes of this chapter, a borrower or cosigner is considered to have a favorable credit report evaluation if the person:

(A) Has an Experian VantageScore of 650 or higher;

(B) Does not have public records that demonstrate credit concerns such as tax liens or bankruptcy proceedings;

(C) Has a minimum of four credit trade lines, excluding student loans or authorized user accounts; and

(D) Has not defaulted on any federal, state, or private education loans.

(11) [(10)] Fund--The Texas Opportunity Plan Fund as created by the Constitution of the State of Texas, Article III, 50b; the Student Loan Revenue Bond Fund authorized in the Texas Education Code, chapter 56, subchapter H; and/or the Student Loan Auxiliary Fund, authorized in the Texas Education Code, chapter 52, subchapter F.

(12) [(11)] Half-Time--For undergraduates, enrollment or expected enrollment for the equivalent of at least six but fewer than nine semester credit hours per regular semester. For graduate students, enrollment or expected enrollment for the equivalent of 50 percent of the normal full-time course load of the student's program of study as defined by the institution.

(13) [(12)] Institution of Higher Education--As defined in Texas Education Code, §61.003.

(14) [(13)] Insufficient Resources to Finance Education--A requirement for a student to be eligible for certain loan programs. For the purposes of this chapter, a student is considered to have insufficient resources to finance his or her education if the student's cost of attendance is greater than the total amount of financial aid offered to the student. The amount of federal Direct Loans for which the student is eligible must be included in the calculation of the financial aid offered, regardless of whether the student receives the loans.

(15) [(14)] Manageable Debt--A [An undergraduate] student's level of aggregated student loan debt from all sources (including federal, state, and private student loans) such that the student's estimated monthly payment (for all loans) five years after graduation is less than 10 percent of the student's projected income, assembled using wage data from the Texas Workforce Commission based on the student's course of study. Not later than the final day of January of each odd-numbered year, the Coordinating Board shall publish updated manageable debt levels. [See Figure 1 for more information]

[Figure: 19 TAC §24.1(14)]

(16) [(15)] Private or Independent Institution of Higher Education--As defined in Texas Education Code, §61.003.

(17) [(16)] Program Officer--The individual named by each participating institution's chief executive officer to serve as agent for the Coordinating Board. The Program Officer has primary responsibility for all ministerial acts required by the program, including the determination of student eligibility, selection of recipients, maintenance of all records, and preparation and submission of reports reflecting program transactions. Unless otherwise indicated by the institution's chief executive officer, the director of student financial aid shall serve as Program Officer.

(18) [(17)] Repayment Period--The length of time during which a borrower is expected to fully repay the borrower's loan(s). The repayment period is used to determine the number of payments required to repay the loan(s) and therefore the borrower's minimum monthly payment.

(19) [(18)] Student Loan--A loan incurred by a student to assist in covering the student's cost of education.

(20) [(19)] Student Loan Debt--The outstanding balance of principal, interest, and fees associated with an individual's education or student loans.

(21) [(20)] Semester Credit Hour--A unit of measure of instruction, represented in intended learning outcomes and verified by evidence of student achievement, that reasonably approximates one hour of classroom instruction or direct faculty instruction and a minimum of two hours out of class student work for each week over a 15-week period in a semester system or the equivalent amount of work over a different amount of time. An institution is responsible for determining the appropriate number of semester credit hours awarded for its programs in accordance with Federal definitions, requirements of the institution's accreditor, and commonly accepted practices in higher education.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600070

Douglas Brock

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6365


SUBCHAPTER D. COLLEGE ACCESS LOAN PROGRAM

19 TAC §24.45

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (Coordinating Board) proposes amendments to Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 24, Subchapter D, §24.45, concerning Loan Amount and Interest Rate. Specifically, this amendment will extend aggregate debt limits in the Program to students enrolled in master's degree programs.

The Coordinating Board is authorized by Texas Education Code, Chapter 52, Subchapter C, to adopt rules relating to its student loan programs.

Rule 24.45, Loan Amount and Interest Rate, is amended to reflect the extension of the aggregate debt limit associated with the definition of "manageable debt" in §24.1 to graduate students enrolled in master's degree programs in subsection (c)(1). Conforming edits are made to subsection (c)(2) to specify that doctoral and professional students are subject to a different aggregate debt limit.

Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, has determined that for each of the first five years the sections are in effect there would be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

There is no impact on small businesses, micro businesses, and rural communities. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering the section will be the greater alignment between agency operations and strategic goals regarding debt attainment. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Government Growth Impact Statement

(1) the rules will not create or eliminate a government program;

(2) implementation of the rules will not require the creation or elimination of employee positions;

(3) implementation of the rules will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency;

(4) the rules will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency;

(5) the rules will not create a new rule;

(6) the rules will not limit an existing rule;

(7) the rules will not change the number of individuals subject to the rule; and

(8) the rules will not affect this state's economy.

Comments on the proposed rule or information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable data, research or analysis, may be submitted to Dr. Charles W. Contero-Puls, Assistant Commissioner for Student Financial Aid Programs, P.O. Box 12788, Austin, Texas 78711-2788, or via email at SFAPPolicy@highered.texas.gov. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

The amendment is proposed under Texas Education Code, Chapter 52, Subchapter C, which provides the Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules relating to its student loan programs.

The proposed amendment affects Texas Administrative Code, Title 19, Part 1, Chapter 24, Subchapter D.

§24.45. Loan Amount and Interest Rate.

(a) Minimum Loan Amount. No College Access Loan may be authorized for less than $100.

(b) Annual Loan Limit. In no case shall the annual loan amount exceed the difference between the cost of attendance and the financial resources available to the applicant, including the applicant's scholarships, gifts, grants, and other financial aid. The student's maximum eligibility for Federal Direct Loans, except for Federal PLUS loans, must be considered by the institution as other financial aid, whether or not the student actually receives such assistance.

(c) Aggregate Loan Limit.

(1) For [undergraduate] students enrolled in undergraduate or master's degree programs, the maximum aggregate loan amount for any eligible student shall not exceed the student's manageable debt level, as defined in §24.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions).

(2) For students enrolled in doctoral or [graduate and] professional degree programs [students], the maximum aggregate loan amount for an eligible student is the sum of the student's annual limits.

(d) Interest Rate. The interest rate charged for new loans shall be set from time to time by the Commissioner, shall be simple interest, and shall begin to accrue on the outstanding principal from the date of disbursement, including during periods of forbearance.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600071

Douglas Brock

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6365


PART 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

CHAPTER 89. ADAPTATIONS FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS

SUBCHAPTER AA. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES

DIVISION 7. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

19 TAC §§89.1150, 89.1175, 89.1195, 89.1197

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes amendments to §§89.1150, 89.1175, 89.1195, and 89.1197, concerning special education services. The proposed amendments would clarify program practices and requirements relating to dispute resolution in accordance with House Bill (HB) 2 and Senate Bill (SB) 568, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Section 89.1150 establishes general provisions for special education dispute resolution. Proposed new subsection (b) would inform parents and school districts that TEA may share student-level information with an outside entity in accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act for the purposes of facilitating local resolution of disputes related to special education.

Section 89.1175 establishes representation in special education due process hearings. The proposed amendment would add new subsection (d)(2) to establish a requirement for the non-attorney representative to have knowledge of all special education dispute resolution options available to parents to align with HB 2 and SB 568, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025. A proposed amendment to the figure in subsection (c) would reflect the new requirement for alignment.

Section 89.1195 establishes provisions for special education complaint resolution. After careful consideration and a targeted focus on assisting school systems and families with preventing and resolving disagreements at the earliest stage possible, TEA is proposing deletion of subsections (f) and (j) that authorize a party to request a reconsideration process if the party feels that the agency made an error that was material to its decision or was incorrect in its determination. A reconsideration process is not required under federal or state law. Given the narrow scope of the reconsideration process, the agency has determined that students' best interests are served if agency staff prioritize assisting parties with preventing disputes and, when disputes do occur, focus on comprehensive, thorough, and accurate investigations and investigative reports.

The proposed amendment to §89.1197 would update the section title to align with HB 2 and SB 568. Further proposed changes to subsections (c) and (f)(2) would allow statewide individualized education program facilitation to be utilized prior to a potential dispute and when a dispute has arisen related to the provision of a free appropriate public education. These changes align the rule with HB 2 and SB 568. Proposed updates to subsections (f) and (f)(3) would provide clarity to school districts and parents regarding the process and timeline for when a request for a state-appointed facilitator must be filed.

FISCAL IMPACT: Jennifer Alexander, associate commissioner of special populations and student supports, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.

SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.

COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would expand and limit existing regulations. The proposed amendments would clarify program practices and requirements regarding dispute resolution to align with HB 2 and SB 568, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025.

The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Alexander has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to ensure the rules are current by aligning them with federal law, state statute, and administrative rule and assist parents and school districts with requirements for dispute resolution for students receiving special education and related services. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.

DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.

PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: TEA requests public comments on the proposal, including, per Texas Government Code, §2001.024(a)(8), information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule and any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. The public comment period on the proposal begins January 23, 2026, and ends February 23, 2026. Public hearings will be conducted to solicit testimony and input on the proposed amendment at 9:30 a.m. on February 12 and 13, 2026. The public may participate in either hearing virtually by linking to the hearing at https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87029464077. Anyone wishing to testify must be present at 9:30 a.m. and indicate to TEA staff their intent to comment and are encouraged to also send written testimony to sped@tea.texas.gov. Each hearing will conclude once all who have signed in have been given the opportunity to comment. Questions about the hearing should be directed to Derek Hollingsworth, Special Populations Policy and Compliance, Derek.Hollingsworth@tea.texas.gov. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendments are proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.001, which requires the agency to develop and modify as necessary a statewide plan for the delivery of services to children with disabilities that ensures the availability of a free appropriate public education to children between the ages of 3-21; TEC, §29.010, which establishes criteria for general supervision and compliance; TEC, §29.019, which establishes criteria for individualized education program (IEP) facilitation; TEC, §29.020, as amended by House Bill (HB) 2 and Senate Bill (SB) 568, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes criteria for state-administered IEP facilitation; TEC, §29.0162, as amended by HB 2 and SB 568, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes criteria for representation in a special education due process hearing; 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.149, which establishes the state educational agency responsibility for general supervision; 34 CFR, §300.151, which establishes the criteria for the adoption of state complaint procedures; 34 CFR, §300.152, which establishes the criteria for minimum state complaint procedures; 34 CFR, §300.153, which establishes the criteria for filing a complaint; 34 CFR, §300.504, which establishes the criteria for procedural safeguards notice; 34 CFR, §300.512, which establishes hearing rights; and 34 CFR, §300.600, which establishes criteria for state monitoring and enforcement.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The amendments implement Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.010, and 29.019; §29.020 and §29.0162, as amended by House Bill 2 and Senate Bill 568, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025; and §29.0162; and 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §§300.149, 300.151, 300.152, 300.153, 300.504, 300.512, and 300.600.

§89.1150. General Provisions.

(a) It is the policy and intent of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to encourage and support the resolution of any dispute that arises between a parent and a public education agency relating to the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of or the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to a student with a disability at the lowest level possible and in a prompt, efficient, and effective manner.

(b) To implement the policy and intent described by subsection (a) of this section and to offer opportunities for an alternative means of dispute resolution when a parent and a public education agency are in disagreement, TEA may disclose information to a representative as authorized by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act to assist with resolution efforts. Neither party would be required to engage in this process, and the information shared would only be for purposes of determining interest of either party in an alternative or early resolution process.

(c) [(b)] The possible options for resolving disputes include, but are not limited to:

(1) meetings of the student's admission, review, and dismissal committee, including individualized education program (IEP) facilitation if offered by the public education agency in accordance with §89.1196 of this title (relating to Individualized Education Program Facilitation);

(2) meetings or conferences with the student's teachers or providers;

(3) meetings or conferences, subject to the public education agency's policies, with the campus administrator, the special education director of the public education agency (or the shared services arrangement to which the public education agency may be a member), the superintendent of the public education agency, or the board of trustees of the public education agency;

(4) requesting state IEP facilitation in accordance with §89.1197 of this title (relating to State-Administered [State] Individualized Education Program Facilitation);

(5) requesting mediation through TEA in accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.506;

(6) filing a complaint with TEA in accordance with 34 CFR, §300.153; or

(7) requesting a due process hearing through TEA in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.507-300.514.

§89.1175. Representation in Special Education Due Process Hearings.

(a) A party to a due process hearing may represent himself or herself or be represented by:

(1) an attorney who is licensed in the State of Texas; or

(2) an individual who is not an attorney licensed in the State of Texas but who has special knowledge or training with respect to problems of children with disabilities and who satisfies the qualifications of this section.

(b) A party who wishes to be represented by an individual who is not an attorney licensed in the State of Texas must file a written authorization with the hearing officer promptly after filing the request for a due process hearing or promptly after retaining the services of the non-attorney representative. The party must forward a copy of the written authorization to the opposing party at the same time that the written authorization is filed with the hearing officer.

(c) The written authorization must be on the form provided in this subsection.

Figure: 19 TAC §89.1175(c) (.pdf)

[Figure: 19 TAC §89.1175(c)]

(d) The written authorization must include the non-attorney representative's name and contact information and a description of the non-attorney representative's:

(1) special knowledge or training with respect to problems of children with disabilities;

(2) knowledge of all special education dispute resolution options available to parents, including due process hearings, state complaints, mediation, and individualized education program facilitation;

(3) [(2)] knowledge of the rules and procedures that apply to due process hearings, including those in 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §§300.507-300.515 and 300.532, if applicable, and this division;

(4) [(3)] knowledge of federal and state special education laws, regulations, and rules; and

(5) [(4)] educational background.

(e) The written authorization must state the party's acknowledgment of the following:

(1) the non-attorney representative has been given full authority to act on the party's behalf with respect to the hearing;

(2) the actions or omissions by the non-attorney representative are binding on the party, as if the party had taken or omitted those actions directly;

(3) documents are deemed to be served on the party if served on the non-attorney representative;

(4) communications between the party and a non-attorney representative are not generally protected by the attorney-client privilege and may be subject to disclosure during the hearing proceeding;

(5) neither federal nor state special education laws provide for the recovery of fees for the services of a non-attorney representative; and

(6) it is the party's responsibility to notify the hearing officer and the opposing party of any change in the status of the authorization and that the provisions of the authorization will remain in effect until the party notifies the hearing officer and the opposing party of the party's revocation of the authorization.

(f) If the non-attorney representative receives monetary compensation in exchange for representing the party in the due process hearing, the written authorization must affirm the following:

(1) the non-attorney representative has agreed to abide by a voluntary code of ethics and professional conduct during the period of representation; and

(2) the non-attorney representative and the party have entered into a confidential, written representation agreement that includes a process for resolving any disputes that may arise between the non-attorney representative and the party.

(g) The written authorization must be signed and dated by the party.

(h) An individual is prohibited from being a party's representative under subsection (a)(2) of this section if the individual has prior employment experience with the school district and the school district raises an objection to the individual serving as a representative based on the individual's prior employment experience. No other objections to a party's representation by a non-attorney are permitted under this section.

(i) Upon receipt of a written authorization filed under this section, the hearing officer must promptly determine whether the non-attorney representative is qualified and meets the requirements to represent the party in the hearing and must notify the parties in writing of the determination. A hearing officer's determination is final and not subject to review or appeal.

(j) A non-attorney representative may not file pleadings or other documents on behalf of a party, present statements and arguments on behalf of a party, examine and cross-examine witnesses, offer and introduce evidence, object to the introduction of evidence and testimony, or engage in other activities in a representative capacity unless the hearing officer has reviewed a written authorization filed under this section and determined that the non-attorney representative is qualified to represent the party in the hearing.

(k) In accordance with the Texas Education Code, §38.022, a school district may require an attorney or a non-attorney representative who enters a school campus to display his or her driver's license or another form of government-issued identification. A school district may also verify whether the representative is a registered sex offender and may apply a policy adopted by its board of trustees regarding the action to be taken when a visitor to a school campus is identified as a sex offender.

§89.1195. Special Education Complaint Resolution.

(a) In accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.151, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) has established a complaint resolution process that provides for the investigation and issuance of findings regarding alleged violations of Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) or a state special education statute or administrative rule.

(b) A complaint may be filed with [the] TEA by any individual or organization and must:

(1) be in writing;

(2) include the signature and contact information for the complainant;

(3) contain a statement that a public education agency has violated Part B of the IDEA; 34 CFR, §300.1 et seq.; or a state special education statute or administrative rule;

(4) include the facts upon which the complaint is based;

(5) if alleging violations with respect to a specific student, include:

(A) the name and address of the residence of the student;

(B) the name of the school the student is attending;

(C) in the case of a homeless child or youth (within the meaning of §725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Act (42 United States Code, §11434a(2)), available contact information for the student and the name of the school the student is attending;

(D) a description of the nature of the problem of the student, including facts relating to the problem; and

(E) a proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and available to the party at the time the complaint is filed;

(6) allege a violation that occurred not more than one calendar year prior to the date the complaint is received; and

(7) be forwarded to the public education agency that is the subject of the complaint at the same time that the complaint is filed with [the] TEA.

(c) A complaint must be filed with [the] TEA by electronic mail, mail, hand-delivery, or facsimile. [The] TEA has developed a form that may be used by persons or organizations filing a complaint. The form is available on request from [the] TEA and is also available on the TEA website. The complaint timeline will commence on the business day that TEA receives the complaint. If a complaint is received on a day other than a business day, the complaint timeline will commence on the first business day after the day on which [the] TEA receives the complaint. The one-calendar-year statute of limitations for a complaint will be determined based on the day that the complaint timeline commences.

(d) If a complaint does not meet the requirements outlined in subsection (b) of this section, [the] TEA must notify the complainant of the deficiencies in the complaint.

(e) Upon receipt of a complaint that meets the requirements of this section, [the] TEA must initiate an investigation to determine whether the public education agency is in compliance with applicable law and regulations in accordance with the following procedures.

(1) [The] TEA must send written notification to the parties acknowledging receipt of a complaint.

(A) The notification must include:

(i) the alleged violations that will be investigated;

(ii) alternative procedures available to address allegations in the complaint that are outside of the scope of Part B of the IDEA; 34 CFR, §300.1, et seq.; or a state special education statute or administrative rule;

(iii) a statement that the public education agency may, at its discretion, investigate the alleged violations and propose a resolution of the complaint;

(iv) a statement that the parties have the opportunity to resolve the complaint through mediation in accordance with the procedures in §89.1193 of this title (relating to Special Education Mediation);

(v) a timeline for the public education agency to submit:

(I) documentation demonstrating that the complaint has been resolved; or

(II) a written response to the complaint and all documentation and information requested by [the] TEA;

(vi) a statement that the complainant may submit additional information about the allegations in the complaint, either orally or in writing within a timeline specified by [the] TEA, and may provide a copy of any additional information to the public education agency to assist the parties in resolving the dispute at the local level; and

(vii) a statement that [the] TEA may grant extensions of the timeline for a party to submit information under clause (v) or (vi) of this subparagraph at the request of either party.

(B) In accordance with 34 CFR, §300.504, upon receipt of the first special education complaint filed by a parent during a school year, TEA will provide an electronic copy of the Notice of Procedural Safeguards to the parent, and the public education agency against which the complaint is filed must provide the parent with a hard copy of the Notice of Procedural Safeguards unless that parent has elected, in accordance with 34 CFR, §300.505, to receive the required notice by electronic mail, if the public education agency makes that option available.

(C) The public education agency must provide [the] TEA with a written response to the complaint and all documentation and information requested by [the] TEA. The public education agency must forward its response to the parent who filed the complaint at the same time that the response is provided to [the] TEA. The public education agency may also provide the parent with a copy of the documentation and information requested by [the] TEA. If the complaint was filed by an individual other than the student's parent, the public education agency must forward a copy of the response to that individual only if written parental consent has been provided to the public education agency.

(2) If the complaint is also the subject of a due process hearing or if it contains multiple issues of which one or more are part of that due process hearing, [the] TEA must:

(A) set aside any part of the complaint that is being addressed in the due process hearing until the conclusion of the hearing; and

(B) resolve any issue in the complaint that is not a part of the due process hearing.

(3) If an issue raised in the complaint has previously been decided in a due process hearing involving the same parties, [the] TEA must inform the complainant that the due process hearing decision is binding.

(4) [The] TEA has 60 calendar days after a valid written complaint is received to carry out the investigation and to resolve the complaint. [The] TEA may extend the time limit beyond 60 calendar days if exceptional circumstances, as determined by [the] TEA, exist with respect to a particular complaint. The parties will be notified in writing by [the] TEA of the exceptional circumstances, if applicable, and the extended time limit. The time limit may also be extended if the parties agree to extend it in order to engage in mediation pursuant to §89.1193 of this title or other alternative means of dispute resolution. In accordance with the Texas Education Code, §29.010(e), [the] TEA must expedite a complaint alleging that a public education agency has refused to enroll a student eligible for special education and related services or that otherwise indicates a need for expedited resolution, as determined by [the] TEA.

(5) During the course of the investigation and in resolving the complaint, [the] TEA must:

(A) conduct an investigation of the complaint that must include a complete review of all relevant documentation and that may include interviews with appropriate individuals and an independent on-site investigation, if necessary;

(B) consider all facts and issues presented and the applicable requirements specified in law, regulations, or standards;

(C) make a determination of compliance or noncompliance on each issue in the complaint based upon the facts and applicable law, regulations, or standards and issue a written report of findings of fact and conclusions, including reasons for the decision, and any corrective actions that are required, including the time period within which each action must be taken;

(D) review any evidence that the public education agency has corrected noncompliance on its own initiative;

(E) ensure that [the] TEA's final decision is effectively implemented, if needed, through technical assistance activities, negotiations, and corrective actions to achieve compliance; and

(F) in the case of a complaint filed by an individual other than the student's parent, provide a copy of the written report only if written parental consent has been provided to [the] TEA.

(6) In resolving a complaint in which a failure to provide appropriate services is found, [the] TEA must address:

(A) the failure to provide appropriate services, including corrective action appropriate to address the needs of the student, including compensatory services, monetary reimbursement, or other corrective action appropriate to the needs of the student; and

(B) appropriate future provision of services for all students with disabilities.

(7) In accordance with 34 CFR, §300.600(e), the public education agency must complete all required corrective actions as soon as possible, and in no case later than one year after [the] TEA's identification of the noncompliance. A public education agency's failure to correct the identified noncompliance within the one-year timeline will result in an additional finding of noncompliance under 34 CFR, §300.600(e), and may result in sanctions against the public education agency in accordance with §89.1076 of this title (relating to Interventions and Sanctions).

[(f) If a party to a complaint believes that the TEA's written report includes an error that is material to the determination in the report, the party may submit a signed, written request for reconsideration to the TEA by electronic mail, mail, hand-delivery, or facsimile within 15 calendar days of the date of the report. The party's reconsideration request must identify the asserted error and include any documentation to support the claim. The party filing a reconsideration request must forward a copy of the request to the other party at the same time that the request is filed with the TEA. The other party may respond to the reconsideration request within five calendar days of the date on which the TEA received the request. The TEA will consider the reconsideration request and provide a written response to the parties within 45 calendar days of receipt of the request. The filing of a reconsideration request must not delay a public education agency's implementation of any corrective actions required by the TEA.]

(f) [(g)] In accordance with 34 CFR, §300.151, [the] TEA's complaint resolution procedures must be widely disseminated to parents and other interested individuals, including parent training and information centers, protection and advocacy agencies, independent living centers, and other appropriate entities.

(g) [(h)] In exercising its general supervisory authority under 34 CFR, §300.149 and §300.600, [the] TEA may resolve any other credibly alleged violation of IDEA or a state special education statute or administrative rule that it receives even if a sufficient complaint is not filed with [the] TEA in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.151-300.153, and this section. In doing so, [the] TEA may take one or more of the following actions:

(1) requesting a response and supporting documentation from a public education agency against which a credible violation of IDEA or a state special education statute or administrative rule has been alleged;

(2) conducting a desk or on-site investigation of a public education agency;

(3) making a determination regarding the allegation(s); and

(4) requiring a public education agency to implement corrective actions to address any identified noncompliance.

(h) [(i)] For the purposes of subsection (g) [(h)] of this section, anonymous complaints, complaints that are received outside the one-calendar-year statute of limitations for a special education complaint, and complaints that do not include sufficient information or detail for [the] TEA to determine that an alleged violation of special education requirements may have occurred will not be considered to be credible complaints under this section but may possibly be addressed through the procedures describe by §97.1071 of this title (relating to Special Program Performance; Monitoring, Review, and Supports).

[(j) If the public education agency against which a complaint is received under subsection (h) of this section believes that TEA made an incorrect determination of noncompliance, the public education agency may submit a written request for reconsideration to the TEA within 15 calendar days of the date that TEA issued its findings. The reconsideration request must identify the asserted error and include any documentation to support the claim. The TEA will consider the reconsideration request and provide a written response to the public education agency within 45 calendar days of receipt of the request. The filing of a reconsideration request must not delay a public education agency's implementation of any corrective actions required by the TEA.]

§89.1197. State-Administered [State] Individualized Education Program Facilitation.

(a) In accordance with Texas Education Code, §29.020, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) will establish a program that provides independent individualized education program (IEP) facilitators.

(b) For purposes of this section, where TEA is referenced in subsections (c)-(p) of this section and where not otherwise prohibited by law, TEA may delegate duties and responsibilities to an education service center (ESC) when it is determined to be the most efficient way to implement the program.

(c) For the purpose of this section, IEP facilitation has the same general meaning as described in §89.1196(a) of this title (relating to Individualized Education Program Facilitation), except that state IEP facilitation may be utilized by a school district and a parent of a student with a disability to avoid a potential dispute relating to the provision of a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) or [is used] when the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee meeting has ended in disagreement [is in dispute] about decisions relating to the provision of FAPE [a free and appropriate public education] to a student with a disability and the facilitator is an independent facilitator provided by TEA.

(d) A request for IEP facilitation under this section must be filed by completing a form developed by TEA that is available upon request from TEA and on the TEA website. The form must be filed with TEA by one of the parties by electronic mail, mail, hand-delivery, or facsimile.

(e) IEP facilitation under this section must be voluntary on the part of the parties and provided at no cost to the parties.

(f) In order for TEA to provide an independent facilitator, the request must be submitted jointly by a school district and a parent of a student with a disability, and the following conditions must be met.

(1) The required form must be completed and signed by both parties.

(2) The parties believe that a state-appointed IEP facilitator may assist in avoiding a potential dispute relating to the provision of FAPE or [dispute must relate to] an ARD committee meeting has ended in disagreement regarding the provision of FAPE and the committee has [in which mutual agreement about one or more of the required elements of the IEP was not reached and the parties have] agreed to recess and reconvene the meeting in accordance with §89.1055(o) of this title (relating to Individualized Education Program).

(3) The request for IEP facilitation must be received by TEA at least 10 calendar days prior to the ARD committee meeting for which a facilitator is being requested or within 10 calendar days of the ARD committee meeting that ended in disagreement. A state-appointed[, and a] facilitator must be available on the date set for [reconvening] the meeting.

(4) The same parties must not have participated in IEP facilitation concerning the same student under this section within the same school year of the filing of the current request for IEP facilitation.

(g) Within five business days of receipt of a request for an IEP facilitation under this section, TEA will determine whether the conditions in subsections (d)-(f) of this section have been met and will notify the parties of its determination and the assignment of the independent facilitator, if applicable.

(h) Notwithstanding subsections (c)-(f) of this section, if a special education due process hearing or complaint decision requires a public education agency to provide an independent facilitator to assist with an ARD committee meeting, the public education agency may request that TEA assign an independent facilitator. Within five business days of receipt of a written request for IEP facilitation under this subsection, TEA will notify the parties of its decision to assign or not assign an independent facilitator. If TEA declines the request to assign an independent facilitator, the public education agency must provide an independent facilitator at its own expense.

(i) TEA's decision not to provide an independent facilitator is final and not subject to review or appeal.

(j) The independent facilitator assignment may be made based on a combination of factors, including, but not limited to, geographic location and availability. Once assigned, the independent facilitator must promptly contact the parties to clarify the issues, gather necessary information, and explain the IEP facilitation process.

(k) TEA will use a competitive solicitation method to seek independent facilitation services, and the contracts with independent facilitators will be developed and managed in accordance with TEA's contracting practices and procedures.

(l) At a minimum, an individual who serves as an independent facilitator under this section:

(1) must have demonstrated knowledge of federal and state requirements relating to the provision of special education and related services to students with disabilities;

(2) must have demonstrated knowledge of and experience with the ARD committee meeting process;

(3) must have completed 18 hours or more of training in IEP facilitation, consensus building, and/or conflict resolution as specified in TEA's competitive solicitation;

(4) must complete continuing education as determined by TEA;

(5) may not be an employee of TEA or the public education agency that the student attends; and

(6) may not have a personal or professional interest that conflicts with his or her impartiality.

(m) An individual is not an employee of TEA solely because the individual is paid by TEA to serve as an independent facilitator.

(n) An independent facilitator must not be a member of the student's ARD committee, must not have any decision-making authority, and must remain impartial to the topics under discussion. The independent facilitator must assist with the overall organization and conduct of the ARD committee meeting by:

(1) assisting the committee in establishing an agenda and setting the time allotted for the meeting;

(2) assisting the committee in establishing a set of guidelines for the meeting;

(3) guiding the discussion and keeping the focus on developing a mutually agreed upon IEP for the student;

(4) ensuring that each committee member has an opportunity to participate;

(5) helping to resolve disagreements that arise; and

(6) helping to keep the ARD committee on task so that the meeting purposes can be accomplished within the time allotted for the meeting.

(o) An independent facilitator must protect the confidentiality of personally identifiable information about the student and comply with the requirements in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act regulations, 34 CFR, Part 99, relating to the disclosure and redisclosure of personally identifiable information from a student's education record.

(p) TEA will develop surveys to evaluate the IEP facilitation program and the independent facilitators and will request that parties who participate in the program complete the surveys.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600063

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Rulemaking

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


CHAPTER 153. SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL

SUBCHAPTER FF. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING PREPARING AND RETAINING EDUCATORS THROUGH PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM ALLOTMENT

19 TAC §§153.1301 - 153.1306

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new §§153.1301, 153.1302, 153.1303 153.1304, 153.1305, and 153.1306, concerning school district personnel. The proposed new subchapter would establish rules concerning the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) Program Allotment, which was enacted by House Bill (HB) 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: HB 2 established the PREP Program Allotment and requirements needed for districts and open-enrollment charter schools to access funds. New Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.911, requires the commissioner of education to establish rules necessary to implement TEC, Chapter 21, Subchapter R.

Definitions

Proposed new §153.1301 would establish definitions for commonly used terms in new Subchapter FF.

General Provisions

Proposed new §153.1302 would establish general provisions for the PREP Program Allotment. The proposed new rule would streamline and clarify general provisions that apply to all five of the PREP programs funded by the allotment. Each subsequent section under Subchapter FF would detail additional provisions unique to each of the PREP programs.

New §153.1302(a) would establish eligibility requirements for accessing PREP Program Allotment funds, application procedures, and approval processes. It would also establish a process through which school systems could identify interest in the funding opportunity, as the PREP program is an optional entitlement.

New §153.1302(b) would include provisions for school system funding and spending. PREP Program Allotment funding is based on a statutory formula, and the subsection would clarify how the TEA would calculate allotments.

New §153.1302(c) would indicate information school systems must submit to TEA in order for TEA to calculate annual allotments, along with information that would be necessary for the commissioner to engage in periodic reviews of programs under the requirements of TEC, §21.909.

New §153.1302(d) would clarify the periodic review process that the commissioner is required to implement under TEC, §21.909. This subsection would also include actions TEA may take as a result of the reviews.

New §153.1302(e) would specify how renewals or withdrawals from the program would occur to allow school systems to plan accordingly.

PREP Preservice Residency Preservice Program

HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, 2025, created an optional PREP Residency Preservice Program, detailed in TEC, §21.904 and §48.157, for those districts choosing to implement a paid teacher residency program. Section 153.1303 would further clarify requirements in statute for the PREP Residency Preservice Program.

Proposed new §153.1303(a) would specify general provisions related to the new rule.

Proposed new §153.1303(b) would specify eligibility for school districts, charter schools, and educator preparation programs (EPPs).

Proposed new §153.1303(c) would specify program standards, including partnership agreements, clinical teaching experience, teacher resident engagement, coursework completion, and host and mentor teacher pairing.

Proposed new §153.1303(d) would establish performance goals.

Proposed new §153.1303(e) would specify timelines for periodic reviews of performance goals.

Proposed new §153.1303(f) would outline funding requirements.

Proposed new §153.1303(g) would outline program spending requirements.

PREP Grow Your Own Program

HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, 2025, created an optional PREP Grow Your Own Program, detailed in TEC, §21.906 and §48.157, for those school districts or open-enrollment charter schools choosing to implement a Grow Your Own Program. Proposed new §153.1304 would pertain to the PREP Grow Your Own Program.

Proposed new §153.1304(a) would specify general provisions related to the new rule.

Proposed new §153.1304(b) would specify school district and charter school eligibility for participation.

Proposed new §153.1304(c) would specify program standards, including high school program requirements, requirements for supporting school district or eligible charter school employees, guidance and transition supports, scheduled release time for employees, employee job assignment, and completion of bachelor's degree and certification requirements.

Proposed new §153.1304(d) would establish performance goals.

Proposed new §153.1304(e) would specify timelines for periodic reviews of performance goals.

Proposed new §153.1304(f) would outline funding and spending requirements.

PREP Mentorship Program

HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, created an optional PREP Mentorship Program, detailed in TEC, §21.907 and §48.157, for those school districts or open-enrollment charter schools choosing to implement a mentorship program in accordance with TEC, §21.458. Proposed new §153.1305 would clarify aspects of law related to mentor training programs for new teachers.

Proposed new §153.1305(a) would specify general provisions related to the new rule.

Proposed new §153.1305(b) would specify program standards, including mentor teacher qualifications, number of beginning teachers a mentor teacher may be assigned, staff who must complete mentor training, and the timelines related to mentor training. Subsection (b) would also clarify the appropriate times of day and frequency with which meetings between mentors and beginning teachers should occur and the topics that mentor teachers and beginning teachers must cover.

Proposed new §153.1305(c) would establish program performance goals.

Proposed new §153.1305(d) would outline funding and spending requirements.

EPP Training Content

Proposed new §153.1306 establishes EPP training content requirements related to the implementation of PREP Preservice Programs.

New §153.1306(a) would establish general provisions for EPP training content development and related training for faculty and staff responsible for preparing teacher candidates in preparation route established by TEC, §21.04422.

New §153.1306(b) would establish TEA processes for the development of content materials prior to use in teacher candidate preparation.

New §153.1306(c) would establish the requirement for TEA to develop and deliver training to EPP faculty and staff to implement and redeliver the required training content materials.

FISCAL IMPACT: Jessica McLoughlin, associate commissioner for educator preparation, certification, and enforcement, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.

SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.

COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would create new regulations by establishing the PREP program and the rules that guide the program's implementation for school districts and open-enrollment charter schools.

The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand, limit, nor repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.

PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. McLoughlin has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to ensure rule language is based on current law and provide school districts and open-enrollment charter schools with clarification on the requirements and process needed to participate in the optional PREP Program Allotment. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.

DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would create a new data collection for school districts and charter schools that choose to participate in the program. The reporting requirements, authorized under TEC, §§21.902, 21.904, 21.906, and 21.907, relate to implementation of and participation in the program.

PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposed new rules would require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher, such as participation in annual surveys. However, proposal would impose the least burdensome requirement possible to achieve the objective of the rules.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: TEA requests public comments on the proposal, including, per Texas Government Code, §2001.024(a)(8), information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rule and any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. The public comment period on the proposal begins January 23, 2026, and ends February 23, 2026. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on January 23, 2026. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new sections are proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.901, as added by House Bill (HB) 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes definitions for Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) programs; TEC, §21.902, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes provisions for three PREP Preservice Programs: PREP Preservice Traditional Program, PREP Preservice Residency Program, and PREP Preservice Alternative Program; TEC, §21.903, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes requirements for the PREP Preservice Traditional Program; TEC, §21.904, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes a PREP Preservice Residency Program for participating school districts or open-enrollment charter schools to implement teacher residency preservice programs that provide teacher candidates with extensive year-long clinical practice under the supervision of a host teacher. It also outlines permissible use of allotment funds, which include candidate pay, mentor stipends, and training and administrative costs; TEC, §21.905, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes requirements for the PREP Preservice Alternative Program; TEC, §21.906, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes a PREP Grow Your Own Program for participating school districts or open-enrollment charter schools to implement Grow Your Own Programs supporting district or open-enrollment charter school employees who do not hold a teaching certificate in completing a bachelor's degree and enrolling in a preparation program for teacher certification and high school students in completing education and training career and technical education (CTE) courses to help prepare students for the teaching profession. It also outlines permissible use of allotment funds, which include program implementation and paying tuition and fees for participating students and employees; TEC, §21.907, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes a PREP Mentorship Program for participating school districts or open-enrollment charter schools to implement a mentoring program that meets the requirements of TEC, §21.458, for classroom teachers who have less than two years of teaching experience. It also outlines permissible use of mentor program allotment funds, which include mentor teacher stipends, scheduled release time for mentoring activities, and mentor support through providers of mentor training; TEC, §21.908, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes requirements for educator preparation program supports; TEC, §21.909, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes the requirement for the commissioner to establish performance standards, goals, and periodic review of the PREP program; TEC, §21.910, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which includes provisions for authority to accept certain money; TEC, §21.911, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, requires the commissioner to adopt rules as necessary to implement TEC, Chapter 21, Subchapter R; TEC, §48.157, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes a PREP Program Allotment and a formula to determine the amount to which eligible school districts and open-enrollment charter schools are entitled for each PREP program; TEC, §21.067, as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which requires the commissioner to develop and make available content training materials and related EPP faculty training required for preparing teacher candidates enrolled in any of the PREP Preservice Programs; and TEC, §21.044(i), as added by HB 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025, which establishes the content training requirements for teacher candidates enrolled in any of the PREP Preservice Programs.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new sections implement Texas Education Code, §§21.901-21.911 and 48.157, as added by House Bill 2, 89th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2025.

§153.1301. Definitions.

In addition to terms defined in Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.901, the following words, terms, and phrases shall have the following meanings when used in this subchapter.

(1) Beginning teacher--A classroom teacher in Texas with fewer than two years of teaching experience in the subject or grade level to which the teacher is assigned.

(2) Charter school--A Texas public school that meets one of the following criteria:

(A) is operated by a charter holder under an open-enrollment charter granted either by the State Board of Education or commissioner of education pursuant to TEC, §12.101, identified with its own county district number;

(B) has a charter granted under TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapter C;

(C) has a charter granted under TEC, §12.256, and Human Resources Code, §221.002; or

(D) has a charter granted under TEC, §11.157(b).

(3) Classroom teacher--An educator who is employed by a school system in Texas and who, not fewer than an average of four hours each day, teaches in an academic instructional setting or a career and technical instructional setting. The term does not include a teacher's aide or a full-time administrator. For purposes of this subchapter, a classroom teacher includes an educator who may not yet hold a certificate issued under TEC, Chapter 21, Subchapter B.

(4) Clinical teaching--This term has the meaning assigned in §228.2 of this title (relating to Definitions).

(5) Cooperating teacher--This term has the meaning assigned in TEC, §21.901(3), and further defined in §228.2 of this title.

(6) Co-teaching--This term has the meaning assigned in §228.2 of this title.

(7) Educator preparation program--This term has the meaning assigned in §228.2 of this title.

(8) Full-time mentor teacher--A mentor teacher whose primary role is supporting the development of beginning teachers through mentorship.

(9) Host teacher--This term has the meaning assigned in §228.2 of this title. A host teacher will serve in lieu of a cooperating teacher in the supervision of teacher residents.

(10) Instructional support--The range of opportunities in which an individual teacher candidate is actively supporting learners to acquire knowledge and develop skills to achieve learning goals. Settings for these activities may include, but are not limited to, co-teaching with a cooperating teacher within a classroom, research-based tutoring, and 1-1 or small group interventions.

(11) Internship--This term has the meaning assigned in §228.2 of this title.

(12) Mentor teacher--An individual who serves or has served as a teacher in Texas who provides effective support to help beginning teachers successfully transition into the teaching assignment. An appraiser, as defined by TEC, §21.351, may serve as a mentor teacher but may not mentor a classroom teacher for whom they are responsible for appraising.

(13) Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) program--One of the five PREP programs under TEC, §§21.903-21.907 and 48.157.

(14) Preservice program--One of the three PREP programs under TEC, §§21.904-21.906, that includes a partnership between a school district or eligible charter school and an eligible educator preparation program.

(15) Reduced teaching load--Rostering and scheduling strategies that reduce the number of instructional periods assigned to classroom teachers, achieved through methods such as reducing the number of sections assigned to the classroom teacher, increasing the number of students in certain sections to enable release time, hiring additional staff, or other strategic staffing approaches.

(16) Release time--Periods of time within the regularly contracted school day in which classroom teachers, teacher candidates, and educational aides are released from direct instructional activities or responsibilities supervising students, such as arrival and dismissal duties, to engage in required activities for their roles.

(17) School system--A school district or charter school.

(18) Strategic staffing--For the purpose of the PREP programs described in this subchapter, the process by which a school system and an education preparation program design and implement a paid clinical teacher experience that is sustainably funded by reallocating school district resources to compensate teacher candidates who take on additional instructional responsibilities on the campus, such as tutoring, substitute teaching, or providing release time for lead teachers, while completing their clinical teaching requirements.

(19) Teacher--A superintendent, principal, supervisor, classroom teacher, school counselor, or other school district or charter school employee who provides direct instructional support to other teachers.

(20) Teacher candidate--This term has the meaning assigned in TEC, §21.901(8).

(21) Teacher of record--This term has the meaning assigned in §228.2 of this title.

§153.1302. General Provisions for the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Program.

(a) Eligibility, application procedures, and approval processes.

(1) In addition to school districts, charter schools as defined in §153.1301 of this subchapter (relating to Definitions), may apply to receive funding for the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) Program Allotment with the following provisions.

(A) All preservice PREP programs under Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.902(a), must provide practice opportunities for teacher candidates in prekindergarten-Grade 12 classrooms. Charter schools with a charter granted under TEC, §12.256, and Human Resources Code, §221.002, are ineligible to receive funding under TEC, §48.157, for PREP preservice programs under TEC, §§21.903-21.905, or the PREP Grow Your Own Program under TEC, §21.906.

(B) Charter schools with a charter granted under TEC, §12.256, and Human Resources Code, §221.002, are eligible to apply for the PREP Mentorship Program under TEC, §21.907.

(C) Charter schools that have a charter granted under TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapter C, are subject to the funding caps described in TEC, §48.157.

(D) Charter schools that have a charter granted under TEC, Chapter 12, Subchapter C, must have a written agreement with the partner school district to document how allotment funds generated through the partnership will be spent.

(2) Annually, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) will make publicly available an application and approval process for school systems to apply for PREP program funding under TEC, §§21.903-21.907 and 48.157.

(A) Annually, TEA shall provide:

(i) the timeline for application and approval; and

(ii) statutorily based minimum requirements necessary for an application to be eligible for approval.

(B) School systems must apply for approval separately for each PREP program under TEC, §§21.903-21.907. The approval of one PREP program does not guarantee approval of a separate PREP program.

(C) If TEA determines that an initial application is incomplete, the application will not be approved for funding.

(D) Applicants that are determined to meet the statutorily based minimum requirements shall be approved individually for each PREP program under TEC, §§21.903-21.907.

(E) If a school system's application for a PREP program is denied, it may submit a written response or request for a second review within 30 days of TEA sending the school system its notification.

(3) Annually, TEA will make publicly available a process through which school systems may apply for, add, or remove educator preparation program (EPP) and institution of higher education (IHE) partnerships to meet requirements under TEC, §§21.903-21.906.

(A) Only approved partnerships will be able to generate allotment funding under TEC, §48.157.

(B) Previously approved partnerships must adopt the State Board of Educator Certification-approved EPP content under §153.1306 of this subchapter (relating to Educator Preparation Program Training Content for Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Preservice Programs) or will lose funding eligibility under TEC, §48.157.

(b) Funding and spending requirements.

(1) State funding.

(A) School systems will receive PREP Program Allotment funds based on information collected via TEA data systems. Any difference from the initial and final amount will be addressed as part of the Foundation School Program settle-up process according to the provisions in TEC, §48.272.

(B) Annually, TEA will collect data on PREP program participants that will generate allotment funding under TEC, §48.157, and other related roles such as cooperating and mentor teachers. These data collections will include participant identification information in addition to campus and school system placements.

(C) School systems shall annually verify and confirm teacher candidate and beginning teacher placements and corresponding allotments by the date communicated by TEA.

(D) TEA may exercise administrative discretion to redirect or recalculate funds to a school system in which the teacher candidate is placed if a school system disputes Educator Certification Online System (ECOS) or Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) data. Disputes must be received by the dates communicated by TEA.

(2) Spending. School systems must spend funding generated under TEC, §48.157, in accordance with the provisions under TEC, §§21.903-21.907, and the provisions within this subchapter.

(c) Program submissions.

(1) Annually, unless otherwise specified by TEA, school systems shall complete a program submission for each of the PREP programs for which they receive funds under TEC, §48.157. This program submission shall include implementation data and the distribution of allotment funds from the previous school year in accordance with the funding and spending provisions under TEC, §§21.902-21.907 and 48.157, and this section.

(A) School systems must establish local option codes to accurately monitor and report the appropriate distribution of allotment funds.

(B) School system superintendents, chief financial officers, or other staff roles identified by TEA must certify that the information in the program submission is accurate to the best of their knowledge and complies with all applicable state and federal laws, including TEC, Chapter 39, Subchapter D.

(C) The program submission must be submitted in a format prescribed by TEA and include the name and title of the certifying individual, date of certification, and statement of understanding that false certification may result in criminal penalties.

(2) Annually, unless otherwise specified by TEA, school systems must have program participants, determined by TEA and communicated annually by August 1 each year, such as teachers, campus principals, and human resources personnel, respond to surveys developed by TEA to gauge the perception of the school system's implementation of applicable PREP programs.

(3) School systems shall provide TEA all other data and information requested on PREP program implementation per TEC, §21.902(c)(4) and §21.906(d)(5), or otherwise needed to implement periodic reviews under TEC, §21.909, and subsection (d) of this section. School systems shall submit this data in the format specified by TEA by the communicated deadline. These collections shall include, at minimum, evidence of implementation of written agreements with EPPs or IHEs under TEC, §21.902(c)(1) or §21.906(d)(3), and submission of data through systems such as ECOS and PEIMS for individuals that generate an allotment under TEC, §48.157.

(d) Periodic reviews.

(1) Annually, or at any other time determined by TEA, TEA may engage in a review, pursuant to TEC, §48.272(e), and subject to the period of review limitation in TEC, §48.272(f), of a school system's approved PREP program.

(2) Annually, TEA will review the school system's program submission.

(A) If a school system's program submission under this subsection is incomplete, the commissioner:

(i) may require the school system to complete the submission;

(ii) may require the school system to develop and implement a PREP program improvement plan; or

(iii) may partially or fully rescind the school system's current allotment under TEC, §48.157.

(B) If a school system's program submission includes incorrect information, the commissioner:

(i) may review a school system's PREP Program Allotment budgets and fiscal reports under TEC, §48.010, and in accordance with subsection (e) of this section;

(ii) may take action under TEC, §48.270 and §44.051;

(iii) may require the school system to develop and implement an improvement plan;

(iv) may partially or fully rescind a school system's current allotment; or

(v) may prohibit the school system from participating in a PREP program for a period not to exceed five years consistent with TEC, §21.909(c).

(3) Every three years, TEA will review a school system's performance goal attainment according to the provisions for each of the PREP programs under this section and §153.1303 of this subchapter (relating to Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Residency Preservice Program), §153.1304 of this subchapter (relating to Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Grow Your Own Program), and §153.1305 of this subchapter (relating to Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Mentorship Program). If, in reviewing one of the school system's PREP programs under TEC, §§21.903-21.907, the commissioner determines that the school system has failed to meet the performance goals established for a PREP program under this section and §§153.1303-153.1305 of this subchapter, the commissioner:

(A) may require the school system to develop and implement a PREP program improvement plan;

(B) may partially or fully rescind a school system's current allotment; and

(C) shall prohibit the school system from participating in a PREP program for a period not to exceed five years consistent with TEC, §21.909(c).

(e) Renewals and withdrawals.

(1) Annually, a school system that has been previously approved for funding for a PREP program and does not have a current prohibition on participation in a PREP program under subsection (d)(2)(B)(v) or (3)(A)(iii) of this section will automatically continue to generate an annual allotment under TEC, §48.157. School systems will not need to re-apply to receive year-over-year funding.

(2) School systems may withdraw from participation in a PREP program according to the timelines and processes established by TEA and made publicly available annually by May 1 each year.

§153.1303. Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Residency Preservice Program.

(a) General provisions.

(1) The commissioner of education shall establish the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) Residency Preservice Program as a partnership preservice program to enable qualified educator preparation programs (EPPs), as determined by the commissioner, that meet the teacher residency preparation requirements under Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.04422, to form partnerships with school districts and eligible charter schools to prepare candidates for an enhanced standard certificate. Partnerships participating in this program must meet all general provisions described in §153.1302 of this subchapter (relating to General Provisions for the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Program).

(2) For residency preservice programs to receive funds under TEC, §21.904 and §48.157, they must meet all provisions described in §153.1302 of this subchapter and the program standards listed in this section.

(b) PREP Residency Preservice Program eligibility.

(1) School district and charter school eligibility. School districts and eligible charter schools must have at least one partnership with an approved EPP that has met the eligibility requirements described in paragraph (2) of this subsection.

(2) EPP eligibility.

(A) To participate in the PREP Residency Preservice Program in the 2026-2027 school year, all EPPs must have received previous State Board of Educator Certification (SBEC) approval to offer the Teacher Residency Preparation Route established under Chapter 228 of this title (relating to Educator Preparation Program Requirements).

(B) To participate in the PREP Residency Preservice Program in the 2027-2028 school year and beyond, all EPPs must have received SBEC approval to offer the PREP Teacher Residency Preparation Route established through SBEC rulemaking authority in Chapter 228 of this title.

(c) Program standards. The partnership must meet all residency preservice partnership requirements described in TEC, §21.902 and §21.904, and requirements for the preparation route under TEC, §21.04422, and Chapter 228 of this title. The residency preservice program partnership shall:

(1) develop and submit to the Texas Education Agency (TEA), upon request, a written partnership agreement with at least one approved EPP, with an attestation and explanation of how the partnership shall meet the standards described in this subsection;

(2) provide the teacher resident with a year-long clinical teaching experience aligned to the candidate's certification area in a prekindergarten-Grade 12 classroom. Candidates must meet all requirements for clinical teaching hours and placement described in §228.65 of this title (relating to Residency). The school district or eligible charter school must support the completion of these requirements;

(3) ensure the teacher resident does not serve as a teacher of record while completing the PREP Residency Preservice Program under TEC, §21.902(e). Teacher resident engagement in responsibilities held by a teacher of record for the purpose of learning must meet the requirements described in TEC, §21.902(f);

(4) work collaboratively to ensure that a candidate's schedule supports the candidate's ability to access and complete all required coursework in the residency program;

(5) select and pair the host teacher with the teacher resident.

(A) For the 2026-2027 school year, the school district or eligible charter school will work with the EPP to ensure and track that the host teacher completes all training requirements as described in Chapter 228 of this title.

(B) For the 2027-2028 school year, the school district or eligible charter school will be responsible for registering the host teacher to complete the TEA-developed Texas Mentorship Training. The school district and eligible charter school will ensure and track that the host teacher completes all training requirements for initial participation and retraining requirements described in Chapter 228 of this title;

(6) ensure that the teacher candidate is mentored by a mentor teacher who has completed the Texas Mentorship Training established under TEC, §21.907, for the candidate's first two years as a teacher of record after completing the partnership preservice program. This requirement only applies to teachers who are initially employed in the school district or eligible charter school where they completed their residency; and

(7) commit to all other school district and eligible charter school partner requirements currently described in Chapter 228 of this title.

(d) Performance goals. Performance outcomes prioritize measurement of:

(1) evidence of partnership requirements under subsection (c)(1)-(7) of this section;

(2) percent of teacher residency candidates who complete certification requirements by attaining an enhanced standard certificate; and

(3) teacher resident employment in Texas school districts and eligible charter schools.

(e) Timelines for periodic reviews. The commissioner will review the performance goals described in subsection (d) of this section for each participating residency preservice program beginning three years following the initial PREP Residency Preservice Program approval under §153.1302(a)(4) of this subchapter.

(f) Program funding.

(1) School district and eligible charter school funding.

(A) The school district or eligible charter school will receive initial payment per TEC, §48.157(j)(2), for up to 40 residents.

(B) The school district or eligible charter school will receive the remaining allotment as described under TEC, §48.157(b)(2), upon the candidate's successful attainment of the enhanced standard certificate within one year of beginning the residency program.

(C) The school district or eligible charter school may fund up to 40 additional teacher residents at the rate described in TEC, §48.157(g). Residents must still be compensated as described in TEC, §21.904(d). This provision is only applicable if the school district or eligible charter school does not exceed the total number of candidates under TEC, §48.157(f)(1).

(2) EPP funding. The EPP will receive funding described under TEC, §48.157(h), when each teacher resident completes a full year of employment in a Texas school district or eligible charter school as a teacher of record following attainment of the enhanced standard certificate.

(g) Program spending. Money received under TEC, §48.157, may be used only to implement the PREP Residency Preservice Program and must meet the following spending requirements.

(1) School districts and eligible charter schools shall use funds provided under TEC, §48.157(b)(2), to compensate teacher residents and host teachers as described in TEC, §21.904(c). Teacher residents must be additionally compensated as described in TEC, §21.904(d). The remaining discretionary funding under TEC, §48.157(b)(2), must be used to support the residency preservice program (for example, paying for the TEA-adopted Texas Mentorship Training or funding salaries for program implementation supports, EPP partner supports, expansion of host teacher stipends, or strategic staffing training and support).

(2) EPPs must meet spending requirements pertaining to EPPs under TEC, §48.157(h).

§153.1304. Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Grow Your Own Program.

(a) General provisions.

(1) The commissioner of education shall establish the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) Grow Your Own Program to enable qualified institutions of higher education (IHEs) and educator preparation programs (EPPs), as determined by the commissioner, to form partnerships with school districts and eligible charter schools to establish innovative staffing pipelines to ensure the availability of high-quality classroom teachers to benefit future school district or charter school students.

(2) The PREP Grow Your Own Program applies to school districts and eligible charter schools that seek to support the following aspiring teacher programs. To attain allotment funding, applicants:

(A) must establish an employee program for school district and eligible charter school employees who remain employed in the school district while completing their bachelor's degree and EPP requirements for teacher certification. Employees must be full-time while serving as a paraprofessional or in a role supporting the instruction of students that is not the teacher of record; and

(B) may establish a program for high school students completing education and training career and technical education (CTE) courses and dual enrollment educator pathway coursework.

(3) For a school district or an eligible charter school to receive funds for the PREP Grow Your Own Program under Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.906 and §48.157, it must meet all provisions described in §153.1302 of this subchapter (relating to General Provisions for the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Program) and the program standards listed in subsection (c) of this section.

(b) School district and charter school eligibility. To participate in the PREP Grow Your Own Program, applicants must meet the following eligibility criteria in addition to the requirements described in §153.1302(a) of this subchapter.

(1) Approval to participate in a PREP Preservice Program is described in §153.1302 of this subchapter.

(A) For the 2026-2027 school year, applicants must be approved to participate in the PREP Residency Preservice Program (TEC, §21.904).

(B) For the 2027-2028 school year, applicants must be approved to participate in at least one PREP Preservice Program (TEC, §§21.903, 21.904, or 21.905).

(2) Participating school districts and eligible charter schools must have a written partnership agreement with a bachelor's-degree-conferring IHE and an accredited Texas EPP (if not included within the IHE). The partnership agreement must be established prior to PREP Grow Your Own Program implementation.

(c) Program standards.

(1) High school program. The participant must ensure the following requirements during the high school student's experience in the PREP Grow Your Own Program.

(A) Students must have access to practice in education and training CTE courses and/or dual credit coursework meeting the requirements described in Chapter 127, Subchapter G, of this title (relating to Education and Training).

(B) During the education and training practicum course, students must be paired with a cooperating teacher who has agreed to participate and meets all the cooperating teacher guidelines developed by the employing school district, their IHE, and EPP partners.

(C) Students must have access to transition supports that provide guidance and support to enroll in a post-secondary pathway. These may include:

(i) providing students information regarding local IHEs or community colleges that offer pathways to teacher preparation programs and approved PREP allotment partnership preservice programs under TEC, §21.902; or

(ii) holding, at minimum, one synchronous IHE/community college recruitment event annually to discuss the school district's or eligible charter school's approved partnership preservice programs.

(D) Students shall obtain the Educational Aide I Certificate to the extent practicable.

(2) School district or eligible charter school employee program. The participant must ensure the following requirements during the employee's experience in the PREP Grow Your Own Program.

(A) Employees must have monthly scheduled release time to support completion of a bachelor's degree while remaining employed in the school district. The school district must work with the undergraduate degree program and the EPP to establish a release time schedule that addresses the employee's needs.

(B) Employees must be employed in a role that includes instructional support for students. Employees must spend at least 25% or more of their day focused on instructional support, including the requirement to practice teaching under the supervision of a cooperating teacher.

(C) Employees must have access to transition supports as described in paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection.

(D) Employees must be paired with a cooperating teacher as described in paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection.

(E) Employees may not serve as a teacher of record while completing the PREP Grow Your Own Program under TEC, §21.902(g)(1). Employee engagement in responsibilities held by a teacher of record for the purpose of learning must meet the requirements described in TEC, §21.902(h).

(F) Employees must attain an Educational Aide III certificate within the first year of beginning participation in the school district's or eligible charter school's PREP Grow Your Own Program.

(G) Employees must complete their bachelor's degree and, at a minimum, be enrolled in an accredited EPP within three years of formally beginning participation in the school district's or eligible charter school's PREP Grow Your Own Program.

(d) Performance goals. Performance goals prioritize measurement of the following.

(1) For the PREP Grow Your Own high school program:

(A) evidence of all high school student program requirements under subsection (c)(1)(A)-(C) of this section;

(B) percent of students who obtain the Educational Aide I certificate; and

(C) percent of students enrolled in a bachelor's degree program.

(2) For the PREP Grow Your Own employee program:

(A) evidence of all employee program requirements under subsection (c)(2)(A)-(D) of this section;

(B) percent of employees who obtain the Educational Aide III certificate;

(C) percent of employees enrolled in an EPP within three years of beginning the program; and

(D) percent of employees who complete their bachelor's degree within three years.

(e) Timelines for periodic reviews. The commissioner will review the performance goals described in subsection (d)(1) of this section for each school district and eligible charter school participant beginning three years following the initial PREP Grow Your Own Program approval under §153.1302(a)(4) of this subchapter.

(f) Funding and spending requirements. School districts and eligible charter schools participating in the PREP Grow Your Own Program must meet funding and spending requirements described in TEC, §48.157.

(1) Funding. The school district's or eligible charter school's PREP Grow Your Own Program will receive the remaining 50% of the funding described in TEC, §48.157, when the PREP Grow Your Own employee completes the bachelor's degree requirements and has, at a minimum, enrolled in an accredited EPP within three years of beginning participation.

(2) Spending. Money received under TEC, §48.157, must be used to implement the PREP Grow Your Own Program (for example, implementation of the high school education and training program, tuition for aspiring teachers, wrap-around and transition supports, strategic staffing training and implementation, costs associated with employee preparation in a PREP Preservice Program, and local salaries for program implementation support).

§153.1305. Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Mentorship Program.

(a) General provisions.

(1) The commissioner of education shall establish the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) Mentorship Program to provide mentorship to beginning teachers under Texas Education Code (TEC), §§21.907, 21.458, and 48.157.

(2) In order for a school system to receive funds for the PREP Mentorship Program under TEC, §21.907 and §48.157, they must meet all provisions described in §153.1302 of this subchapter (relating to General Provisions for the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Program) and the program standards in subsection (b) of this section.

(b) Program standards.

(1) Mentor teacher qualifications. A school system must:

(A) prioritize the selection of current classroom teachers as mentor teachers using clear selection criteria, protocols, and hiring processes that align with requirements of this paragraph and TEC, §21.458, and retain documentation of such processes locally;

(B) select mentor teachers who:

(i) have at least three complete years of teaching experience with a superior record of assisting students, as a whole, in achieving improvement in student performance as determined by a set of student growth and/or achievement data. School systems may use the approved designations under TEC, §21.3521, to fulfill this requirement;

(ii) demonstrate interpersonal skills and dispositional criteria prioritized and documented by the school system;

(iii) demonstrate instructional effectiveness and expertise, to the extent practicable, in research-based instructional practices specifically for the grade levels and subjects to which the beginning teacher is assigned; and

(iv) demonstrate leadership skills such as an ability to effectively communicate, influence colleagues to take action, and build trusting relationships with colleagues; and

(C) prioritize the selection of mentor teachers who have experience as classroom teachers in the past three years.

(2) Mentor teacher assignment. School systems must agree to assign no more than:

(A) two beginning teachers to a mentor teacher who serves as a teacher of record for, on average, four or more hours per instructional day;

(B) four beginning teachers to a mentor teacher who serves as a teacher of record for, on average, less than four hours per instructional day;

(C) fifteen beginning teachers to an individual who serves as a full-time mentor teacher; or

(D) four beginning teachers to an individual who serves as neither a teacher of record nor a full-time mentor teacher.

(3) Mentor training. A school system must:

(A) ensure and track that mentor teachers and any appropriate school system and campus employees, such as principals, assistant principals, and instructional coaches, who work with a beginning teacher, supervise a beginning teacher, or oversee the mentorship program complete the Texas Mentorship Training established by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) every three years and:

(i) ensure that mentor teachers and any appropriate school system and campus employees are trained before the beginning of the school year or within three weeks after being assigned a beginning teacher; and

(ii) provide training in alignment with the Texas Mentorship Training scope and sequence that includes best mentorship practices to mentor teachers and any appropriate school system and campus employees throughout the school year;

(B) in the years between Texas Mentorship Trainings, ensure that returning mentor teachers who have completed the Texas Mentorship Training are trained by the school system before the school year begins and one time per semester; and

(C) ensure that any new mentor teachers complete the Texas Mentorship Training in their first year of mentoring.

(4) School system support for mentorship time, scheduling, and logistics. A school system must designate a specific time during the regularly contracted school day for meetings between mentor teachers and the beginning teachers they mentor, which must abide by the mentor teacher and beginning teachers' entitled planning and preparation requirements in TEC, §21.404 and §21.405, and the provisions of paragraph (5)(A) of this subsection. The specific time may vary by campus, grade level, or content area and must be documented by the school system and may be provided through either:

(A) a reduced teaching load for mentor and beginning teachers to facilitate mentor teacher duties described in paragraph (5) of this subsection, which may include rostering and scheduling strategies that provide classroom teachers fewer periods of instruction during the day via approaches such as reducing the number of sections assigned to the mentor teacher, increasing the number of students in certain sections to enable release time, hiring additional staff, or other strategic staffing approaches; or

(B) a release time that is, to the extent practicable, scheduled in advance and predictable.

(5) Duties of a mentor teacher. A mentor teacher must:

(A) meet with each beginning teacher assigned to the mentor teacher not less than 12 hours each semester, with co-teaching or observations of the mentor teacher or other highly effective teachers by the beginning teacher being mentored or observations of the beginning teacher being mentored by the mentor teacher counting toward the 12 hours each semester;

(B) guide, assist, give feedback to, and support the beginning teacher through mentoring sessions addressing:

(i) orientation to the context, policies, and practices of the school system, including:

(I) how to use school system and campus expectations within the classroom and implement routines and procedures with consistency to promote a positive learning environment;

(II) instructional materials, including formative and summative assessments;

(III) campus policies and practices related to instructional preparation; and

(IV) professional expectations;

(ii) data-driven instructional practices, including student work analysis protocols that analyze student work samples individually or collaboratively with the goal of understanding students' thinking, identifying strengths and progress toward mastery, and determining gaps in skills and knowledge; and

(iii) specific instructional coaching cycles, including:

(I) observation and actionable feedback related to research-based instructional strategies;

(II) coaching regarding conferences between parents and the beginning teacher; and

(III) review of available professional development opportunities aligned to feedback; and

(C) meet the mentor requirements specified in Chapter 228 of this title (relating to relating to Educator Preparation Program Requirements) if mentoring a classroom teacher engaging in an internship.

(6) Teacher participation reporting. A school system must ensure mentor teachers and beginning teachers participating in the mentorship program are accurately coded in a data system specified by TEA, such as the Educator Certification Online System, in accordance with TEA's specifications and deadlines.

(c) Performance goals. Performance goals prioritize measurement of:

(1) mentor teacher qualifications under subsection (b)(1) of this section;

(2) mentor teacher training completion under subsection (b)(3) of this section;

(3) mentor teacher duties under subsection (b)(5)(A)-(B) of this section; and

(4) school system duties related to mentoring time, scheduling, and logistics under subsection (b)(4) of this section.

(d) Funding and spending requirements.

(1) A school system shall use money received under TEC, §48.157(b)(5), to provide stipends for mentor teachers, including:

(A) for mentor teachers under subsection (b)(2)(A) and (B) of this section, $1,000 per beginning teacher; and

(B) for mentor teachers under subsection (b)(2)(C) and (D) of this section, at least $1,000.

(2) If any money received under TEC, §48.157, remains after providing stipends to mentor teachers in accordance with subsection (c) of this section, the school system may use that money to provide:

(A) scheduled release time for mentor teachers and classroom teachers being mentored to meet and engage in mentoring activities; and

(B) support for mentor teachers through mentor training, strategic staffing training, and compensation for school system staff responsible for overseeing and directing the annual mentorship training requirements.

§153.1306. Educator Preparation Program Training Content for Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership Preservice Programs.

(a) General provisions. The commissioner of education shall develop and make available content training materials and related training required for Educator Preparation Program (EPP) faculty and staff who are responsible for preparing teacher candidates enrolled in any of the Preparing and Retaining Educators Through Partnership (PREP) Preservice Programs under Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.067 and §21.044(i).

(b) Texas Education Agency (TEA) processes for materials development. TEA shall develop EPP training content materials as determined by the commissioner for use in the preparation of candidates being prepared in a PREP Preservice Program. TEA shall develop the materials in the following manner.

(1) TEA staff will provide regular updates to the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) regarding proposed content development or updates and related timelines.

(2) TEA staff will ensure training content materials will be designed to meet the requirements under TEC, §21.067(b).

(3) TEA staff will conduct a final review of materials prior to recommending that SBEC take action to require use of the materials in the preparation of teacher candidates in a PREP Preservice Program (TEC, §21.0044(i)(1)).

(c) Training and certification of EPP staff and faculty.

(1) TEA shall develop and provide training to EPP faculty and staff to support EPPs to:

(A) implement and effectively redeliver the materials described in subsection (b) of this section in the preparation of candidates being prepared through PREP Preservice Programs; and

(B) implement and effectively deliver the Texas Reading Academies and Math Achievement Academies required for the preparation of certain teacher candidates under TEC, §21.044(i)(2), being prepared through PREP Preservice Programs.

(2) TEA shall include a faculty certification process within the faculty training described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 12, 2026.

TRD-202600065

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Rulemaking

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 22, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497